This content was originally posted by: babur1527I wholeheartedly agree with the post. Hated the Asoka movie. I am probably one of the very few in the forum here.
At the time the movie was released, I was so darned grateful to see a 'genuine historical bollywood' movie. When was the last time they did anything historical before that? Amrapaali? The movie got a lot of things wrong, but it got a lot of things right too (Sushok rivalry, how Sushim's mom influenced the emperor etc).This content was originally posted by: babur1527I don't know about anyone else, but I for one am sick and tired of warrior princesses. Cliched, over-hyped and over done.
Oh yes me too.Hollywood is chock full of kick ass women.We can put the blame squarely there. But CAS had shown us so many different kinds of women. IIRC Noor is the only woman who had martial arts training.So it is likely that they'll depict each of Ashok's wives differently.This content was originally posted by: babur1527KVK should have been portrayed as a commoner.
As far as the general population is concerned (including CAS CVs) if it is shown in a Bollywood movie, it is written in stone.This content was originally posted by: shailusri1983Even this fascination for the one true love of an emperor who belonged to the past ages is nothing but the attempt to impose our modern sensibilities on an ancient set up. Kings married a number of times. Several of the wives were his favorites or important in his life in their own peculiar way. Pologamy was a truth of those times. There were cultures where polyandry was common. Does this mean that there is one true love among all these marriages and the rest are irrelevant? Show things as they were..
Again the movie is partly to blame for that.Devi was not given much importance in the movie.From this people inferred that Kaurwaki was Ashok's one and only love.The CAS show is following suit.As you say, we impose our modern sensibilities on people who lived in another era.Ashok must have loved each of the women at a certain time and then moved on to another one who caught his interest.Even though we admire him for his many esteemed values it doesn't take away the fact that he was an ancient Casinova.
I agree, Ashoka and Asandhimitra's story would've been a delight to watch. I feel like their relationship was much similar to what Ashoka and Ahankara had shared with each other, like Ahankara had said, "Ashok aur mera ek ankaha sa rishta hai" and "hum dono ek doosre ke liye bane hain". There was this level of maturity and understanding that they shared with each other (that too, at such a young age) which was absolutely endearing to watch. That is why I was so disappointed when Ahankara did not turn out to be Asandhimitra.
Yes, Asandhimitra could definitely be a more positive version of Helena. I think that she should be portrayed as possessing all the qualities that you mentioned.
@bold I couldn't agree more. The CVs are obviously portraying Karuvaki as a warrior princess and I absolutely hate it. It's such a cliche that only warrior princesses can be independent, smart, witty and strong. Look at Helena, for example, she does not fight with swords etc. but she is one hell of a powerful woman and empress, mainly due to her intellect.
This content was originally posted by: babur1527I wholeheartedly agree with the post. Hated the Asoka movie. I am probably one of the very few in the forum here.
The story between Ashok and Asandhimitra would have been so unique.Asandhimitra herself would have been a unique heroine. I was expecting that she would be like a more positive Helena. Sharp witted, knowledgeable and deals with everything with a touch of class. She doesn't need a sword to deal with her enemies.
And her companionship with Ashok is something that audiences(historical audiences that actually care) would have enjoyed.
I don't know about anyone else, but I for one am sick and tired of warrior princesses. Cliched, over-hyped and over done.
KVK should have been portrayed as a commoner. And a religious one who sees the light in then Chandaal Ashok's dark heart. It is not only loyal to history but it also makes sense as to why Chandaal Ashok becomes Dharma Ashok after Kaurwaki walks into his life.
This content was originally posted by: capricornrcks
At the time the movie was released, I was so darned grateful to see a 'genuine historical bollywood' movie. When was the last time they did anything historical before that? Amrapaali? The movie got a lot of things wrong, but it got a lot of things right too (Sushok rivalry, how Sushim's mom influenced the emperor etc).
Oh yes me too.Hollywood is chock full of kick ass women.We can put the blame squarely there. But CAS had shown us so many different kinds of women. IIRC Noor is the only woman who had martial arts training.So it is likely that they'll depict each of Ashok's wives differently.
As far as the general population is concerned (including CAS CVs) if it is shown in a Bollywood movie, it is written in stone.
Again the movie is partly to blame for that.Devi was not given much importance in the movie.From this people inferred that Kaurwaki was Ashok's one and only love.The CAS show is following suit.As you say, we impose our modern sensibilities on people who lived in another era.Ashok must have loved each of the women at a certain time and then moved on to another one who caught his interest.Even though we admire him for his many esteemed values it doesn't take away the fact that he was an ancient Casinova.
This content was originally posted by: staryypriyai think she was kalinga's princess...coz i have read in some book that one of the reason of kalinga war was kalinga's princess..but she never wanted to get married ...bt i m nt sure if her name was karuvaki or not
comment:
p_commentcount