Firstly, did I take the name you are mentioning?Secondly, I did not bring that lady, I brought the aforementioned article as a reminder of the event which changed the general sentiment. And from that artice any dignified person can judge that upfront people such as Sanaya cannot be friends with that kind of a person. Thus when Sanaya has stated the obvious, I cannot understand why instead of honouring her statement, a lengthy discussion spanning 14 pages ensued, whatever the subtopics may be, and don't you think it was your joke which was responsible for this?Thirdly, a few days back you must have read some posts by a woman, who used to claim she is an advocate when RR was on air, in the Sanaya new show discussion threads. Those posts were highly discriminatory in nature and the words used were crude, primitive and insensitive. And your joke has provided nutrition to the tyranny of such a person.Fourthly, some so-called Sanish's fans show their true colours even if someone whispers Sanaya is more popular, and that too in Sanaya's thread. I cannot understand if you claim you support both, how can you not seem to be able to accept Sanaya's popularity, in fact you go livid when Sanaya and popular in one sentence. Don't you think your joke would be a wonder pill for such sadists?Fifth, Mediocre? I would like to know the yardstick you use to measure quality of acting, as it appears to me your yardstick cannot differentiate between natural and forced acting.Sorry for this "mammoth" post in comparison to your "Lilliput" joke but it was necessary because I no longer want to be caught in this whirlpools of nonsensical talk and thus here I end this discussion once and for all by my side.
comment:
p_commentcount