Originally posted by: NimbuMirchi
Say whatever to Amir.
but Your 2nd para makes no sense buddy. And don't worry not your fault. Must be my comprehending abilities. I am in long weekend mood already. π
saying PK led people to act violently --- is actually like this. Apple to Watermelon comparison.
I thought PK movie conveyed to NOT trust these god-mans and stop getting hurt over my religion.. my religion.
So, the ones who destroyed properties & acted violently -- actually did not even got the message of movie otherwise they hadn't done so. Must be their comprehending abilities. π
PK offended the sentiments of Hindu groups.
They reacted violently by vandalising cinemas
If there was no PK, then there would've been no violent reaction, and no cinemas would've been vandalised in its name. Simple cause and effect. π
If Aamir wants to lecture people about responsibility with creative freedom, then he should've been a bit more responsible than to make a movie that satirizes a religion, of all the places, in India. π
PK wasn't just an attack on "godmen", it was an attack on Hindu rituals and religious practices also. Funny that, when it's about a subject that does not offend you but offends others, then you make a sarcastic comment on their "comprehending abilities", but when it's about a subject that offends you, then oh no!, we can't take this lightly now, can we? π
And to use your own argument, the ones who got offended and upset over the roast, did not get the humour, otherwise they wouldn't be calling for a ban/censorship.
Must be their comprehending abilities. π
comment:
p_commentcount