Popularity of a show is inversely proportional to its positivity

Originally posted by: TrueLoveLasts

who isn't??😆😆 she (Ekta) got them married literally a week back and she's already planning their separation😆😆 and this is how all shows on TV work, the more negative they are, the larger the audience.. MATH has just proved it once again.. Pre leap, when it wasn't this negative, it had a loyal audience yes, but didn't catch that many eyeballs, now that Ranveer Ishaani's friendship has been ripped apart, and both their characters have been completely ruined (especially Ishaani's) and they've been forced into marriage with every other person (Chirag, Disha, Amba, Baa, Ritika) trying to separate them, its finally found an audience👎🏼 and they aren't😆😆 i still remember when Smriti and Saakshi had come in Koffee With Karan, Smriti had said there that Ekta says trps are proportional to tears.. the more tears the leads shed, the higher the TRPs, and unfortunately, shows need TRPs to survive the rat race hence all their content gets compromised on..

Originally posted by: Marigold_09

However they could put a little more effort in writing or creativity...in SOAP dramas there is always bound to be negativities just to spice things up and lenghthen the drama but still the characters are not made so dumb like that of Ishaani and now this rationale of Ritika marrying Chirag if the SBB segment news to be believed on...
I feel that the MATH writers have been extra lazy..Literally a liitle more thought/creativity/change in characters would go a long way and make the story more enjoyable...there are so many other ways to still stretch the drama and dilemas rather than going with same story repeating itself in the drama again.. I honestly haven't watched many EK shows...however i have heard of one of her shows Yeh hain Mohabattein which too is an EK serial and it too will be having all this drama and twist but atleast both the lead characters have more depth..or atleast that's what i have heard/read...here the female lead character is sometimes just annoying...hence my point that writers havie been extra lazy/uncreative...

Originally posted by: Elvish_Hobbit

Just got to know this from MATH. This while positive wasn't as popular and now with full of negative idiocy it's getting popular. Wow! It simply means viewers don't identify with the positivity but the otherwise. To balance the equation of 'popularity' and 'positivity' a Constant is introduced named 'Negativity'. Only then it becomes a perfect show and that's when the viewers embrace the characters profoundly! Er...sorry if you guys got confused. It's kinda tricksy. :D I'm just annoyed with the new spoiler/video thingy thinking how EK ruined such a wonderful story due to her over-smartness- if that's what she thinks she is!
P.S. I mean no offense to any other show. I don't know how their story is handled, but thinking about the audience these shows are made for I don't expect them be better either.

Originally posted by: monamie111

Elvis...first of all congrats for being a Goldie ⭐️...

But I am not able to understand the meaning of ur post...I missed first 20 mins in last friday's episode...was there anything that I have missed?...😕...the new spoiler is about Nithin-Falguni track right?...will it be negetive? 😲..I am totally confused now!...

Originally posted by: TrueLoveLasts

welcome to the club😆 we're all shocked😆 and since yesterday everyone is trying to find SOME sort of logic behind the same😆 Ritika in particular..😆
on that note, when the mehendi designer had messed up the names on their hands, i had guessed then that this is their indirect way of hinting towards the future track.. especially since the Ranveer Ishaani thing turned out to be true a week later, just expected better of Ritika since she seemed like such a sweet and sensible character so didnt believe it then, but i guess i was hoping for too much😆..