Maham death - no proper closure and glorifying evil

Maham death has come too soon and without proper closure to many issues

Kya bolna, buddy, am too hating this glorification of such an evil woman s death 😕

i fully agree with u

A very telling compilation, and your conclusions are impeccable.

Of course Jodha does not know the half of these crimes either, especially the one about the miscarriages, but even so, she is given to mindless sentimentality and carries on as if she was the repository of all the wisdom and history of the Mughal dynasty, not to mention her standing role as the angel of mercy. The most curious thing is that the real Mughals, Hamida, Salima and Gulbadan Begum let her carry on without any contradiction.

The whole thing was done much, much better and far more convincingly in the film, but then the Mahaam there was, as a character, far superior to this evil creature as well.

Shyamala B.Cowsik

Originally posted by: myviewprem

Maham death has come too soon and without proper closure to many issues

1) What about the many attempts on Akbar's life before?

Akbar has no idea that she had an hand in them like the one near Delhi market as shown in movie

2) What about Maham killing the 2 girls who wanted to complain to Akbar about Adham's atrocities?

3) What about Rani roopmati committing suicide because of adham khan?

4) What about Maham killing Akbar's babies - no disclosure of that fact till now?

5) What about Ruqaiah unable to conceive because of the ark given by Maham

6) What about killing of peer Muhammad by Adham and Maham?

7) What about Bairam Khan killed so brutally because Maham betrayed him?

CVs when will Akbar no all this. I would be OK if he knew all this and still went to meet Maham on her death bed. But this is not done.

Why is Jodha making such big issue of Maham's taking care of Akbar and saving him. So many people be it BK, Atagah, ahmed Khan, Hindal Mirza have given their life to save him and make him emperor. Has Akbar cared for them like Maham or treated them as nicely as Maham? And they all did not even try to kill Akbar once in life. They also had kids and could have been ambitious to make their kids as Shahenshah.

Why are CVs through Jodha glorifying a villan so much? When Maham's deeds are put against her taking care of Jalal the good deeds pale out in front of the bad ones. No one can excuse trying to kill another human to make your son an emperor and to protect your son and yourself. Like that we can say Hitler was a great leader of Germany. This is not done CVs.

And have you read humayun nama it clearly says Akbar was raised on the stake of Kabul fort and it was Hindal Mirza who rescued him, Maham and Adham. This serial is showing that Maham saved him from Kabul fort.

CVs seem to be in love with villans like Maham, Ruqaiah, Nigar etc so much so that they are attributing works they never did to them to make them look good in eyes of viewer

Many truths r come out which r mentioned in akbarnama also.

The truths that r not come out are not mentiomed in akbarnama. So may be they would be ficticious.

Now coming to akbarnama, when she misguide akbar for sujamal, she was sent to delhi as punishment. After going thereshe started saying that only because of her ideas jalal could rule as she had done a lot for him and he has thrown her out. When AK dies akbar went himself to delhi to give info about his son dead, for which she told u had done a right thing. After he went, she has ordered troops there to build his son makbara which is called now bhulbhulaiya.

Akbar and Asis khan(son of atgah khan) build a mosque for atag khan which is also in delhi.

And within 40 days maham dies in the sorrow of her son.

When a person is on dead bed nobody says wrong to him. Always remember this. It is said that when person is on dead bed whatever he/she ask god grants him/her as its last wish. We must not hate that person because if we do that we are tied him with that realationship whther it is hate, love or anything. We should always makes them free so that we could also became free from them.

Originally posted by: Sweet24

Many truths r come out which r mentioned in akbarnama also.

The truths that r not come out are not mentiomed in akbarnama. So may be they would be ficticious.

Now coming to akbarnama, when she misguide akbar for sujamal, she was sent to delhi as punishment. After going thereshe started saying that only because of her ideas jalal could rule as she had done a lot for him and he has thrown her out. When AK dies akbar went himself to delhi to give info about his son dead, for which she told u had done a right thing. After he went, she has ordered troops there to build his son makbara which is called now bhulbhulaiya.

Akbar and Asis khan(son of atgah khan) build a mosque for atag khan which is also in delhi.

And within 40 days maham dies in the sorrow of her son.

When a person is on dead bed nobody says wrong to him. Always remember this. It is said that when person is on dead bed whatever he/she ask god grants him/her as its last wish. We must not hate that person because if we do that we are tied him with that realationship whther it is hate, love or anything. We should always makes them free so that we could also became free from them.

Not really BK death truth only Akbar knows who else knows? no one

Jalal knows about AK killing BK.

@myviewprem

Completely agree with u that CVs hasn't completed the many tracks.

But akbar knows that MA was behind the deah of BK as this track was very well shows in JA. It was shown that MA wants to harm the rahim and Samila, this was the reason he marry salima-widow of BK. That time akbarq doesn't have that strength to fight or go against MA. That's why he choose this way.

Now coming to punishment of Ak for distroying Malwa and johar of Rani Rupmati, when akbar came to know about this, he himself went to malwa and tried to killed him, but maham comes there and support AK. That time again I would say he doesn't have that much strainght to go against MA. This was very well shown in JA.

Both the decisions that Akbar took was very wrong.

That is the importance of jodha coming in his life, actually she brings krishna with her, which means dharm/justice with her in akbars life.

Yes I agree CVs haven't completed many tracks.

Yes god gives punishment fot every deed, but a king is not a god, he is just a symbol.

It is just like if u curse somebodyr even u also tied with that curse and can't leave happy. Lord krishna asked draupadi to forgive korwas so that they can get there punishment fully and u don't have to die everyday for this.

If u don't forgive anybody, then u r tied with him even in ur next birth, so that's why we should free him so thfat we could also be free.