Originally posted by: amritatGreat post Bheegi...
I suppose the last paragraph is from a blog...
But the rest are ur words, right?
Anyway, nice post...full of satire n yes the truth, which mostpeople dont want to see.
I guess people blame Draupadi, either bcoz they have not read the text or bcoz they want their favourite characters to be spared...
Either way, the truth does not change...
Besides, if a woman could dictate n declare war, then she herself would have sat on the throne...
And u r right...Like it is said, 'A woman is the greatest enemy of another woman'...
Sometimes as saas, bahu, nanad n sautan n sometimes as blind, insensitive bashers of victims...
I hope someday, people realize this truth, n various authors stop demeaning Draupadi in their novels by putting all the blame on her...
Originally posted by: SabhayataThe very fact that pandavs were ready to forget every insult of panchali and go in for peace proves that Draupadi wasn't responsible for this war
For me no other explanation is needed
Yes she wanted the war ,she was anti peace but pandavas didn't fight the war for her
If they wanted to fight for her they would have never gone in for peace
They only fought after peace process wasn't successful and they had no choice but to fight for their land
Draupadi got avenged as a result for this war but pandavs dindt fight the war for her
If dury would have accepted the peace proposal pandavas would have happily lived with their 5 villages
Originally posted by: bheegiUnfortunately, in today's episode, Draupadi's words: maine hi pratishodh maanga tha didn't go down well with me. No where in the epic does Draupadi say she was responsible for the war- because she wasn't and after today's statement in the show, SP has just given fodder to those minds who want to blame Draupadi
comment:
p_commentcount