Indian Elections 2014!NaMO all way! Warning pg124 - Page 101

Created

Last reply

Replies

1k

Views

57.7k

Users

76

Likes

2.5k

Frequent Posters

MR.KooL thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 11 years ago
AllBlacks1 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
Pappu fail ho gaya sala 😆
charminggenie thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago


When no law can touch Advani , Bal thakrey then how it will to on a powerful CM who himself is at the helm and who control everything HM cm police and all in gujarat on that time . Just an example Advani was the culprit in the Babri demolition but in court he proved that he was there to stop people from demolition .

If you really want to get down to this part of history, then a little re-hash. The start of all this was the late 1980s, when Rajiv Gandhi sensing defeat poked the hornet's nest by dismissing court's ruling about Shaz Bano case (google the details). He was the PM who ordered the locks to be off and pooja's to be conducted over the conflicted land in order to placate the Hindu vote base. A land which was disputed and which SC considered not to be used for religious purposes. Yet he basically favored one religious clan to win him the votes. Now when the Muslims protested and BJP was more cashing on it. He again flipped , banned Rushdie's book, gave ministerial berths to the minority community and basically sat back and let the communities kill each other , while he the Prime head of the state remained mostly mute, because it got him political favors. Result from riots- BJO not in power, Cong still enjoys the rule.


When these small fishes case can be manipulated that forced court to transfer them to other state then forget about big fish. This case is best example where they acquitted by high court by manipulative evidence which forced SC to transfer case. By the way in indian history i never saw a high level politician indicted in riot case or say in other cases. Tell us any instance any CM or PM face jail terms in any cases as far as simple corruption cases.
Indeed a valid question, so who has controlled India for the longest time , why were the party so handicapped to serve justice. Or perhaps because like every other party it , being the prime head of the state ,chose to keep mum , as part of golden handshake. But unlike other CMs or PM , NaMo was investigated and charged, subsequently cleared. So we have a problem where?

chalo accept court need prove not perception , still this perception is after all called as gujarat ka sher. Modi idea we can gudge when he give analogy like kute ka bachcha , in bihar refer pink revolution when gujarat is one of the biggest exporter of leather , refer his opponent as AK 47 , pakistani agent , sahezada not raj kumar , sultane, or in above documentary mian musaraf which nothing to do with state election in 2002 . No wonder who ever voice dissent they called as muslim , pakistani, taliban , sikular, anti indian, anti hindu , traitor etc. i wonder why we face such term that but not when we criticise say sonia rahul etc. no wonder we have pm who is doing so :) in true sense he just reflect us if nothing else even mod. want to muzzle the voice.

It doesn't reflect upon you , me or others. But we cannot ignore the fact that there are certain regions where people are conditioned to be part of this religion based politics- the area can be a Mathura or Azamgarh, the Modus Operandi is same. Or else Mulayam won't be elected in Azamgarh inspite of all the hate speeches and jibes on women. I would accept Modi has used Amit Shah in these areas to cut down ther OBC factor and lure urban Muslims. But in the end, the buck stops with us,we are equally responsible for all these hate politics, if we vote for based on religion, caste etc.
AllBlacks1 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
Charming.. leave it yaar. Some ppl gonna cry ..let them. How many Hindus were butchered under Mulayam singh... during kar seva.. the infamous videos were in every househeld in Gujarat.
Man, the history.. makes me sick n exreamist. One religion poori duniya ke naak me dum kar rakha hai.. I dont even wanna go there.

Jalne do Modi haters ko.. mazaa lete hai. 😎

Bazigar thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: charminggenie

@Baziger.

I probably understand if somebody doesn't support BJP or NaMo for religious reasons or ideological differences.

But what amuses me is the convenient ignore to the the most volatile riots that happened in the very Gujarat during 1969 which saw majority of Muslims killed . The volatility and the cruelty was far more than 2002. This one happened when there was Cong govt both at the centre and state. It was widely believed to have orchestrated due to some internal politics in the main party. But the main point is , the accused went without any investigation and yet have never been politically shunned.

90s saw regular riots in that state, yet no CBI inquiry was conducted for the sitting CMs. Dabgarwad Massacre?

Still we will rehash 2002 riots only and sneer down investigations run by anti-BJP govt for 10 years and a SC ruling.

The UP riots were allowed to happen by local govt and the the UPA Central govt. Why were the victims not rehabilitated by the so-called parties which court themselves as the representatives of minority community. Why would sizable Muslim population not vote for them? Perhaps , because they are sick of being used and traded for lives in this hunger for votes. They want to exercise their vote to get education and jobs. Even if it's Modi who is selling it, they are willing to take this chance , because he may or may not be the murder but parties liek SP,RJD, BSP , don't hide their duplicity.

My point, by giving this decisive mandate to Modi , both majority and minority communities have put pressure on Modi to deliver on the development agenda and to stick to the line , otherwise , he would too be whipped out like others , if he tries to bring religion or region as part of his governance.
He , BJP or RSS cannot afford this political suicide. If the people of India can demolish a 200 odd year party which has ruled the country for eon years, it won't be wise to test their patience now.





1. The fact is modi is itself a established hindutva brand image , it require nothing for him to say loudly all those things he did earlier , in fact sister organisation like VHP RSS will do the work . Modi have to just maintain his image with slide rethoric like sahezada , pakistani agent , kute ka baccha etc. why people call har har modi , hindu hrudayasamrat etc. we will get the answer.

2. In most of the cases there were trace of RSS involvement so also other side of fanatics. Congress is most inefficient in handling riots , infact if we look at history its rajiv gandhi who gave the clue igniting babri ram mandir issue. Regarding difference those CMs leaders etc. dont carry the hindutva ideology or themselves part in the riots . Example if we look history in Bombay riots major participants are shiv sena bjp . Another example which both bjp - cong . try to escape by accusing each other on guj- delhi both gujarat and delhi riots are wrong. But the difference is cong. dont carry an communal ideology against sikhs , just an example i never hear cong. people have anything against sikhs in delhi , but even today if one go to mumbai we will here how siv sena- RSS act. which happens in last 2 decades but they carry the same ideology in our generation now also.

3. The fact on election is india constitute only 13 % muslim so all those parties who ever fighting the shadow boxing or lip service most of the votes get divided. When there is a polarisation of votes then certainly a strong antiincumbency combined with the communal politics with all those PR campaign certainly appeal to many . when all these factors worked it is easy to get a large chunk of votes from 80%. This classic case is they got divided among sp bsp cong etc. even where there is strong concentration where as there is a strong alignment of hindu votes in other side. winning and loosing election works all these complexity . Now both side of these politics on the name of religion still cong. sp bsp etc. politics are symbolic rather than rhetoric. The basic says one should goes for the 80% may be it appeal our todays generation thats why there is a systematic rise of BJP, which infact BJP doing. may be few percentage of GDP growth is important on humanity.

4. For many of us it does not matter those communal fantics we just overlook those but the only thing is in this teaching a lesson we will encourage more fanatics. I will give an example a friend of mine his profile who is more liberal muslim , well educated asked me a question while watching Anurag kashayp movie Black Friday based on bombay riots. He indirectly glorified the blast accused , i confront him he put a question to me that suppose the same incidents of murder... etc. happen to your own near and dear then what will u do ? i find the similarity between that question and teach a lesson. The problem is all regions are not same , there are diversity in areas and fanaticism contain to some extent because India preface liberal , secular society as a whole . Now if we hurt that then that will rebound to us/everyone and nothing else.

Edited by Bazigar - 11 years ago
AllBlacks1 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
The clever strategy says all should goes for the 80% may be it appeal our todays generation thats why there is a systematic rise of BJP.
KareenaKapoorK thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
what did sagarika ghose say??
yo sagarika so secular is trending on twitter😕
AllBlacks1 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
Thats def. not a crime in democracy! Also Congress said its systematic failure of the party cant blame pappy fail ho gaya sala.
AllBlacks1 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
The problem is all reasons are not same , there are diversity in areas and fanaticism contain to some extent because India preface liberal , secular society as a whole . Now if we hurt that then that will rebound to us/everyone and nothing else.

-------------

So, all that has happened b4 Modi even took the office. U got ur answer.
AllBlacks1 thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: .Tangled.

what did sagarika ghose say??

yo sagarika so secular is trending on twitter😕


How can any1 be so secular without being extream secular?

Related Topics

Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: elaichichai · 1 months ago

Now this is what organic ground level hype mass connect in Hindi heartland is all about https://x.com/yadavtejashwi/status/1958897069181083798

https://x.com/yadavtejashwi/status/1958897069181083798
Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: oyebollywood · 5 months ago

https://www.indiaforums.com/article/calls-for-ban-on-abir-gulaal-intensify-amid-pahalgam-attack-outrage_221151

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: elaichichai · 1 months ago

And only the third film apart from Pathan and Jawan to gross 3mn UK pounds on the box office...

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: priya185 · 1 months ago

Best books by Indian authors Name your favourites https://www.instagram.com/reel/DNX9LaQoZC0/?igsh=MXZrNWt3bWEyaHAwNQ==

Expand ▼
Bollywood thumbnail

Posted by: elaichichai · 1 months ago

https://x.com/SacnilkEntmt/status/1953869041560351123?t=U6gBhlCgt-rc0IPRQiwkdQ s=19

https://x.com/SacnilkEntmt/status/1953869041560351123?t=U6gBhlCgt-rc0IPRQiwkdQ
Expand ▼
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".