This quest is most likely to remain open-ended till one of the two things happen.
1. You get bhakti in the lotus feet of Lord SitaRam (coz once that happen, all doubts melt away automatically)
Or
2. You find a "Shotriya Brahmneesth BhagvadBhakt" ready to clarify all your doubts (but then, finding such a person in today's world is more difficult that finding needle in the haystack)
Note that I'm not discouraging you in anyway. There is no problem if doubts persist in your mind, nor there's any problem in discussing divine play endlessly. But thinking that all the doubts about each and every incident of the divine play needs to be resolved to our satisfaction here and now, (which means they need to be resolved at the level of our present intellect and understanding, which then depends upon our current position on the path of dharma, if we are on the path of dharma in the first place, that is).
Reminds me of what my idol, my hero, The Joker said to Batman in "The thin white duke of death". The Joker told Bats there, "what gets me laughing every time is your bone deep conviction that somehow, all of this has to make sense."
anyways, the first thing is, why we so look forward to making perfect sense of only our chosen incidents from the divine play? Talking of Ramayan, we have flying monkeys, talking bears, talking mountains!!! A Sanskrit speaking vulture who dies while trying to protect his human daughter-in-law, ten headed demon, three headed demons, demons with face of foxes and donkeys, clouds showering warm blood instead of raindrops, etc. Yet only certain incidents catch out attention. Naturally because those incidents of our choosing help us view God as human like us, so that's perfectly ok. But even when viewed as human, many actions of the Lord appear super human during divine play. Lord Krishna married 16, 108 times, then had 10 kids from each wife, then smilingly watched each and every of his kid kill each other in Prabhas, stared finishing off evil when He was 6 days old, etc. Very few people are exercised about all this, yet 105 out of 100 persons have an opinion about "Raas Leela."
Talking about this incident under discussion, I asked you in my previous post (the one you found "unsatisfactory")π to look up about meaning of being a king, gave you some places to look at. If you would have taken that trouble, would not have resolved your doubts, but would have given you points to ponder.
Shri Raam decided what is the right thing for him to do in a particular case as a "Dharmaarudh" King. Maybe he erred in his judgement, OK. But the one and only person best placed to decide whether he committed a "grave injustice" on his wife, is Maa Janaki. And what is her opinion about her husband? Again, I'll have to say, read the Ramayan from start to finish and find out.
Then, there's the point about rationale behind any divine play. (Many more points can be discussed, but then I can't type that much, so let's take just one).
For the all powerful and all capable personality whose wish is the only reality, to take some form and appear "doing things" there needs to be some rationale. It certainly cannot be the kiddish ones like "HE came to kill invincible Raavan or kansa or this immortal guy or that immortal fellow." The reason is, what bahkts call the "Prem Siddhant" that Lord dances to each and every tune of those who love Him. Its not just devotees of the Lord saying this, Lord Himself announces, "I'm a slave of my devotees." ("Aham Bhakt Paradheenam.") thus, only and ONLY for his bhakts, He appears before them, live like them, among them, so on. "Prem-ras Siddhant" is quite lengthy to elaborate actually.
If that the rationale behind divine play, what is the Supreme Lord telling his devotees in this incident under discussion? Maybe something as profound as what He said in Bhagvad Gita, "Extremely subtle are the nuances of dharma." Thus, "I tried to decide my dharma as a King, giving first priority to the citizens, last to my family, thought that even if I fail in my dharma as a husband, I'll succeed as a King. But maybe I failed in both."
Or
something as useful to us as what a saint once told me. He said, "Who can be more benevolent than my Ramji? To warn us humans not to base our decisions on the opinions of petty minded gossip mongers, and to remind us that Maa Sita's greatness is beyond comprehension even for the likes of Brahma, Ramji has taken upon himself eternal criticism. Without doubt, there's no one more benevolent than Him."
Ok, enough typing for the day. And this post was not meant to clear your doubts, just like my previous post was not meant for that purpose, primarily because I'm not qualified to clear anyone's doubts, I know so little!!! ππ
So let your quest continue. Bye.
comment:
p_commentcount