Originally posted by Nandiniraizaada
Off course there are two sides but both sides should come to tell the story then only we can analyse what is being said, we cannot analyse it from a fan fiction
I will give an example A and B had a fight for some reason, A won and A recorded it. No one had a clue on B's side of the story. Then after five thousand years C came about read what A's record ( right or wrong) and created B's side of the story from his imagination and interpretation. Could this be called hearing the other side of the coin??? Can we really say from this that B was right or wrong???
I agree that maybe B's side of the story is totally lost but c's story which is written five thousand years later cannot be taken as B's side of the story . It can only be accepted as a fictional interpretation
I also admit that C may be an amazing writer and what he has written can be accepted as a beautiful work of art but cannot question A's records
Good theory.
Plus, from what I understood from the author's first book, he doesn't involve magic and God in anything.
SO while A's story is replete with God and God's magic, B's side of the story is totally devoid of anything of the sort... so wouldn't both stories be sort of unbalanced?
I mean, even if we are taking the losing side and writing, when the original story has magic, why shouldn't the new story also?