Historicals are 80% entertainment and 20% history: Shahbaz Khan - Page 3

Created

Last reply

Replies

51

Views

7584

Users

14

Likes

122

Frequent Posters

staker123 thumbnail
Anniversary 12 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail Engager 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago

Originally posted by: Proud-India


BUNDI TRACK WAS 100 % True

It was happened in between 1557 -1559

Read it & Bairam Khan was entered in Rajputana at that time

JA is totally drama...in every scenes there are only Mahamanga , Rukaiya , Jodha- Jalal

Wasn't Shehansha E Hindustan had any work besides politics of ladies in his family ?

He had numbers of wives & not only over drama with Jodha only , as they are showing

@bold
 
agree
Proud-India thumbnail
Anniversary 11 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 10 years ago
I know Akbar was best Mughal king in all Mughals history

But still he had also many negative impacts ...I disagree with the way they are showing Akbar's characterization in Serial for TRP

He was not that type of Mahan person too ...And Whatever he did with Maharana Pratap , was cruel part of his behavior

I still know that in my history book there was totally written that Akbar was best for Hindu people but his step against Pratap was Black Line of his history 
PROTIM21 thumbnail
Anniversary 11 Thumbnail Group Promotion 1 Thumbnail Commentator 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
Yes protest is against JA, Some dumb people tries to distort history of JA, but JA don't need their certificate.
And so what Mughal is not Indian at that time. In that time, there is nothing wrong with attacking other countries. And they don't destroy India, they made a great India.
staker123 thumbnail
Anniversary 12 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail Engager 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
hi proud India
i want to share my view
yaar historical show need drama
even jhansi ki raani and MP had fictitious track of shakhaveer and krantiguru
in our show also there are certain drama added 
so yeah i agree they are a bit fictitious
but we can't see how much😕
staker123 thumbnail
Anniversary 12 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail Engager 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
hi proud India
i want to share my view
yaar historical show need drama
even jhansi ki raani and MP had fictitious track of shakhaveer and krantiguru
in our show also there are certain drama added 
so yeah i agree they are a bit fictitious
but we can't see how much😕
for ex: abhay who gives us info about akbar told there was vishkanya
but the makers dramatized it by involving jodha



Edited by happygolucky099 - 10 years ago
Proud-India thumbnail
Anniversary 11 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 10 years ago

Originally posted by: PROTIM21

Yes protest is against JA, Some dumb people tries to distort history of JA, but JA don't need their certificate.
And so what Mughal is not Indian at that time. In that time, there is nothing wrong with attacking other countries. And they don't destroy India, they made a great India.



Oh ...You should get Nobel in History as you have searched That type of Unheard History that was never happened 😉

And Mughals & other foreigners distorted India ...Real kings of India from last 2500 years or before it to Aryans - Dravids were best for country

Whatever happening Today in country , May be it can not be happened if they did not come
ChupChupKe thumbnail
Anniversary 12 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 10 years ago

Originally posted by: Proud-India


BUNDI TRACK WAS 100 % True

It was happened in between 1557 -1559

Read it & Bairam Khan was entered in Rajputana at that time

JA is totally drama...in every scenes there are only Mahamanga , Rukaiya , Jodha- Jalal

Wasn't Shehansha E Hindustan had any work besides politics of ladies in his family ?

He had numbers of wives & not only over drama with Jodha only , as they are showing


yeah he had many wives but this show is ONLY n ONLY abt JODHA & AKBAR ðŸ˜ƒ n i think its very much clear from the TITLE of the SHOW ðŸ˜ƒ 
Edited by sonilausarun - 10 years ago
PROTIM21 thumbnail
Anniversary 11 Thumbnail Group Promotion 1 Thumbnail Commentator 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
In the show, they showed cruel akbar also..In the show he is good only with his haram people, jodha's family and aawam not with other rajvanshis. They will definately show pratap and akbar's war.
Peacefulmind thumbnail
Anniversary 12 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 10 years ago

Originally posted by: Proud-India

I know Akbar was best Mughal king in all Mughals history

But still he had also many negative impacts ...I disagree with the way they are showing Akbar's characterization in Serial for TRP

He was not that type of Mahan person too ...And Whatever he did with Maharana Pratap , was cruel part of his behavior

I still know that in my history book there was totally written that Akbar was best for Hindu people but his step against Pratap was Black Line of his history 

hai, 
i am not from history, can you say what is akbars clash towards MP if possible...
in show too Jalal was very cruel in initial days when show began ...

but MP and AKbar hate each other ...but still the track of MP is not started...

can you share the info
Proud-India thumbnail
Anniversary 11 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 10 years ago

Originally posted by: happygolucky099

hi proud India

i want to share my view
yaar historical show need drama
even jhansi ki raani and MP had fictitious track of shakhaveer and krantiguru
in our show also there are certain drama added 
so yeah i agree they are a bit fictitious
but we can't see how much😕



I am agreed ...no one know 100 % real history

I appreciate Team JA & It's work for such a high TRPs in Historical show

But They totally have distorted Culture of Rajputana

And the base of show is wrong of couple Jodha- Akbar

You can read Ayane Akbari...There is no one named as Jodha

Also In this show ...they all time shows stories of Jodha - Jalal

He had numbers of wives ...Jodha was not that type of  so so so special that he interacts with him daily

Here Akbar is king of his home not king of Delhi

They include character Jodha in all stories related to Akbar

Akbar had connection with Tansen , Mansih , Pratap , Birbal - they also add Drama of Jodha- Jalal in these historical characters

So total Mughal history is distorted