will sagar arts show luv kush?

Please comment also along with poll abt what u wud like to see in luv kush episodes and why?

This serial is done by Sagar Pictures, not Sagar Arts.  They are different companies.  Sagar Arts did the original Ramayan 25 years ago, as well as the Ramayan on Imagine TV.  Their other recent serials include Meera, Chandragupta Mauriya and Mahima Shani Dev Ki.  Sagar Pictures did Mahavir Hanuman, Jai Shri Krishna and Dwarkadheesh.  And now this Ramayan. Edited by .Vrish. - 11 years ago

Edited by luminous02 - 11 years ago

sure y not...would love to watch it... there are so many creepy saas bahu dramas... really ramayana is welcome change and then for the ppl like us who havent watched the 1986 version this ramayana is a huge respite😳 i love the show and at present i watch this show only😳...love the family bond in ramayana ...bharat ram lakshman love is a class to watch...some scenes are turn off... but still this show is a treat to watch...i want them to complete ... the story ... Edited by arti07 - 11 years ago

This show tag line is Ramcharitmanas par aadharit "ramayan jeevan ka aadhar" so luv-kush par should not be included.

I m surprised that some of the audience dont wanna see luvkush. actually if the series ends on rama's rajyabhishek then after some months they can make luv kush series on zee tv with same actors na like how they made luv kush in 1989 after 1986 ramayan ended. Luv kush or uttar kand only completes ramayan serial. Ramayan is incomplete without sita going to mother earth and rama leaving to vishnu abode. luv kush story is necessary in todays scenario to create awareness to respect women and not to treat them as dirt by always forcing them to prove their innocence even without any fault and that women shudnt be used like a toy as self respect for a woman is most imp to herEdited by mahamaya - 11 years ago

@ member Mahamaya- I don't want to see any tampered version of LuvKush...

(sorry if I hurt anyone🤔)...coz I have my own reasons...

The person who never made any mistake simply, he is only called god. It means each & every decision taken by god can never be wrong. Whatever he does, these will be definitely any big reason hiding behind that particular decision but for any  simple human being ,It is very difficult to understand the deep truth of god, whatever these humans sees, they believes on that only & used their mentality.

Now I come on the main point. Lord rama was the first person who started the tradition to keep only one wife by which we can easily understand that how much respect lord rama had for women's. Because when any simple person keeps more than one wife, this is only  hurt most to the feeling of any women.

So ultimately I want to request everyone that please don't use anything wrong when we have no proper  awareness of whole truth .Nobody in this world can be good husband as lord rama(these word told by maa sita in ramcharitmanas).

We are very small, so we have no right to say anything without deep information about god decision because we are the creation & God is the creator.

 

NOTE==This is a new version of ramayan and based on "ramcharitmanas". So we should not bring old version of ramayan or ndtv ramayn in between because both old version ramayan based on several different-2 epic may be valmiki ramayan ,ramcharimanas  by goswami tulsidas etc.

 

Topic was that we have to mention our choice about luv-kush part that we want it or not..So everyone have to right for thinking what they want  in this ramayan.

Again I repeated I want this ramayan same as ramcharitmanas .

Edited by superdil19 - 11 years ago

Uttar Kand should only be shown if Sagar Pictures (not Sagar Arts) publicly admits that they're not following Ramcharitmanas. They claim they are "Ramcharitmanas Adhaarit" but the story they've showed so far is anything but that. If they admit to everyone that they're incorporating a lot of sources, only then should they show Luv Kush kand because otherwise, they simply cannot. Why? Ramcharitmanas does not have Uttarkand and ends Ramayana with Ram-Sita's Rajyabhishek.

If they do show it though, they had better show it decently because this is the most controversial chapter of Ramji's life. People come to all sorts of disgusting conclusions about Shri Ram's holy character because of Sita Ma's exile, so I would like them to show Uttar Kand accurately. If they follow Valmiki's Ramayan as basis for Uttar Kand, then they should be careful not to portray Shri Ram as harsh or uncaring, because many movies that showed Uttar Kand before portray Shri Ram as a harsh husband who exiled Sita Ma without a care in the world. That did not happen. Even as per Valmiki Ramayan Shri Ram did feel a lot of pain after Sita's exile, but no movie has portrayed that pain.