hi guyz!! a lot of people have been posting topics on kanchi's acting. some saying she is great and others saying she is not so great cuz. but i think a lot of how well an actor suits a role depends on more than just their acting. i mean a lot of people in the industry these days arent that great actors but we still love them. really good acting is looking like someone totally different in each role and whenever we see a movie or show and recognize an actor how many times do they look totally different? do they use different body language and gestures? not always. i think kanchi suits her role and makes her character come alive and this is why:
first, the thing we notice a lot is an actor's screen presence. kanchi has great charisma, originality and character. secondly, she looks the role. and even if she didn't, she could give off the impression of looking like her role with makeup, hair, etc. so even if her acting isnt that great (which i m not saying it is or isnt), we like the what we see, and if we like the dialogue and scene the rest gets left to our imagination! if we are really into scene, our imagination paints the expressions and body language we expect and want to see on a person in a certain situation even if its not really there. and when we think about what we saw, our memory enhances it
so, whether kanchi is a good actress or not, whether she can cry well or not, whether her facial expressions are always the same or not, she certainly gives the impression of a great actress and brings anu to life!
comment:
p_commentcount