Posted:
Hi Guys,
I have been a member of this forum for quite some time, but don't post that often. Today I just couldn't resist posting because of the sheer contradictions illustrated in this show.
I have been a member of this forum for quite some time, but don't post that often. Today I just couldn't resist posting because of the sheer contradictions illustrated in this show.
I find Archana's character in this current track and even in the previous track for that matter ridiculous and inconsistent with what was shown before.
In terms of her English speaking capabilities, hello... did the creatives forget that she was the management supervisor of something of that sort during the time that she was Manav's boss and was apparently "Educated" enough to manage a business? Did she not participate in meetings, reviewing employee concerns, contracts, etc with Satish and Jaiwant??? What did she speak then, Marathi? were the contracts in Marathi? did she write letters in Marathi??? it's so nonsensical. It seems like the transitional phase of Archana was completely pointless as her character has gone back to the under confident Archana prior to her marriage or the creatives have conveniently forgotten about it.
Also, during the times that Manav was going through financial hardships after their second marriage, did not never occur to Archana to take up a job, or use her qualifications to support the family? In that regard, is it really Manav who should alone take the blame of losing their child? did Archana have no savings from her previous job that Manav had to go begging from all their family members? and now that Manav is so busy with his job and Archana is bored and constantly misunderstands him, can she not do something like Aashna and keep herself busy with at least a part time job? I mean, this whole show has gone nuts and does not make any sense whatsoever.
Cricket
