Originally posted by: magnificent me
@ Gur.N.cool: The table you have posted doesn't reflect the actual TRP of the show. It shows the the "net reach" which you could think of as the availability...but even I am not sure exactly about this. One thing I know is that the net reach isn't the TRP and what niveditha posted shows the position of the show.
aMap ratings recently showed that Dulhan had become the number uno show through out all channels (post reincarnation track) but the TAM ratings showed a different story. I don't trust these aMap ratings. Like I posted yesterday, TAM ratings seems to show a better and dteady rating of the show:
March:
15/03/2009 to 21/03/2009 = 2.78
22/03/2009 to 28/03/2009 = 2.60
29/03/2009 to 04/04/2009 = 3.15
April (latest, as above)
05/04/2009 to 11/04/2009 = 2.5
Yes those are not TRP's actually I too didn't know what aMAP was actually for, but after they started covering IPl I found out that these percentages show, how many people watched the show, even if it was for 1 mintute. So 11 percent of the people tuned into to the chanel at that time. But TRP's are for the entire half an hour, it's calulated by the viewers as well as the time spent.
Here's how it works
"
According to aMap, the TRP for the two matches was 3.6% and 3.8%, respectively, against last year's TRP of 4.3%.
"To
be sure, IPL attracted a lot more viewers this year, but its TRPs are
low compared with last year because a large percentage of people did
not watch the matches for too long," said Joseph Eapen, director of
research at aMap.
TRPs take into account the number of people
who have watched a particular programme for at least 1 minute. So while
the number of viewers who tuned in to IPL was significantly more than
last year, many of them did not spend more than 1 minute every time
they tuned in and didn't count in terms of TRPs."
But i'm still happy that Agle Janam came at number two spot, after Balika Vadhu.
comment:
p_commentcount