LMAO

Sorry, it was apparently a serious and sad episode, but I've only read WU and couldn't resist coming to just say: how funny is it that dadi says deffo Loots stole the necklace so he's INNOCENT. (And yes, I get it, it supposedly means he's innocent of molesting baby.). A thief and cheat is supported with great passion by the woman he stole from, because it allegedly supports her contention that HE didn't do anything (to babypsycho) and THEREFORE Pankaj is still guilty.

Who's to say WHEN Loots stole the necklace, anyway? WHY did noone go with him? (Rhetorical question.) It took over 2 hours to do what? And goons go to fences, not to reputed jewellers to sell stolen goods, but I'll let it pass. It is possible, I guess. And right, the jewellery handed the necklace to Loots afterr sufficient persuasion. Or was his ring worth the same amount? If so, why didn't he just sell the ring and pretend he lost it? This whole scenario stinks.

Be back morning after watching.

I too rofled the fact thinking how he got back the necklace from goons but then he came up with a brilliant cook up..Amazing story n Dai asking Why the hell u did not inform me beforehand ..I myself would have given u necklace😆😆

Originally posted by: drummedup

This track has successfully surpassed the ridiculousness of formula track.

When you think they can't go horrible than this, they make things 1000 times worse.To surprise viewers with stupidity after stupidity is also a talent👏

I know ...Daadi and her logic...he was not busy molesting because he was busy stealing...he had a ring worth the same amount but rather than lie that he lost it and thereby get a new one for free he stole...

Originally posted by: anita_m

Sorry, it was apparently a serious and sad episode, but I've only read WU and couldn't resist coming to just say: how funny is it that dadi says deffo Loots stole the necklace so he's INNOCENT. (And yes, I get it, it supposedly means he's innocent of molesting baby.). A thief and cheat is supported with great passion by the woman he stole from, because it allegedly supports her contention that HE didn't do anything (to babypsycho) and THEREFORE Pankaj is still guilty.

Who's to say WHEN Loots stole the necklace, anyway? WHY did noone go with him? (Rhetorical question.) It took over 2 hours to do what? And goons go to fences, not to reputed jewellers to sell stolen goods, but I'll let it pass. It is possible, I guess. And right, the jewellery handed the necklace to Loots afterr sufficient persuasion. Or was his ring worth the same amount? If so, why didn't he just sell the ring and pretend he lost it? This whole scenario stinks.

Be back morning after watching.

I saw the episode, and it is even more ridiculous in the watching. BQ mouths something like, ''No, Adi is speaking the truth! I trust him.'' And this in reference to the ''truth'' being that he's a thief. And everyone's reactions were whacko (maybe barring Suhani and Bhavna). It wasn't Oh God, we have a thief in the house, or Oh God, whom have we stupidly got psychobaby married to in 10 days, this guy steals from our house, has dealings with unsavoury types who could murder us all in our beds, he's lost his job for fraud, and is a nikamma nikhatu. Nooo. They argue over whether he's LYING. Because if he's lying, he molested baby. If he's telling the truth, and IS a thief, you can trust him and he ain't no molester. Oh grow up, cvs. Nobody's buying your faulty logic. It could be that he may be lying out of fear, just like Radhe and Krishna reacted out of fear. He could be telling the ''truth'', but still be guilty, because where's the proof that the necklace was stolen during baby's traumatic molestation?

And what life lessons he's learning in BH! For his sins, he gets a gentle tap (can't even call it a slap) on the wrist from BQ, with a: ''Next time, don't do such things, ask me.'' Gobsmacked.

I repeat my question: What were those glass pieces (the window pane pretending to be a vase) doing in Adi's shirt? No answer from Adi or cvs. Why is Adi so vindictive in insisting that Pankaj, whom he knows well enough to realise would not molest anyone, is the culprit? Just to shift blame? To take advantage of the situation? To take revenge? All of these? I think cvs have created a new record in turning this character negative so fast.

Edit to Add: AY, I think it was meant that Su and co didn't believe Adi (but nobody bothered to answer the question: IF Adi didn't steal the necklace, where did it go? Can't any one of them even think BQ may have slipped it to him?) so they were trying to prove no jeweller had bought it, which is absolute twaddle. For one, all jewellers aren't listed in the Yellow Pages or equivalent thereof. For another: How sweet, Adi kept in touch with his blackmailer to find out where the goon sold a stolen necklace. Riiiggghhhttt. And finally, why the heck would any reputed jeweller answer that question truthfully to an absolute stranger over the phone?

Ani u think well.Adi has been funded by Dadi to buy the necklace and shut others mouth..dadi had hidden the piece somewhere safe.Else how on earth will goons will inform him that they had sold in some x or y shop n give him address.He had bought a fresh piece and easily displayed the bill.That glass pieces I think gauri had kept it or may be while entering Dadis room he might have slipped on it n broken it(if I were to think like CVs)

Originally posted by: anita_m

I saw the episode, and it is even more ridiculous in the watching. BQ mouths something like, ''No, Adi is speaking the truth! I trust him.'' And this in reference to the ''truth'' being that he's a thief. And everyone's reactions were whacko (maybe barring Suhani and Bhavna). It wasn't Oh God, we have a thief in the house, or Oh God, whom have we stupidly got psychobaby married to in 10 days, this guy steals from our house, has dealings with unsavoury types who could murder us all in our beds, he's lost his job for fraud, and is a nikamma nikhatu. Nooo. They argue over whether he's LYING. Because if he's lying, he molested baby. If he's telling the truth, and IS a thief, you can trust him and he ain't no molester. Oh grow up, cvs. Nobody's buying your faulty logic. It could be that he may be lying out of fear, just like Radhe and Krishna reacted out of fear. He could be telling the ''truth'', but still be guilty, because where's the proof that the necklace was stolen during baby's traumatic molestation?

And what life lessons he's learning in BH! For his sins, he gets a gentle tap (can't even call it a slap) on the wrist from BQ, with a: ''Next time, don't do such things, ask me.'' Gobsmacked.

I repeat my question: What were those glass pieces (the window pane pretending to be a vase) doing in Adi's shirt? No answer from Adi or cvs. Why is Adi so vindictive in insisting that Pankaj, whom he knows well enough to realise would not molest anyone, is the culprit? Just to shift blame? To take advantage of the situation? To take revenge? All of these? I think cvs have created a new record in turning this character negative so fast.

Edit to Add: AY, I think it was meant that Su and co didn't believe Adi (but nobody bothered to answer the question: IF Adi didn't steal the necklace, where did it go? Can't any one of them even think BQ may have slipped it to him?) so they were trying to prove no jeweller had bought it, which is absolute twaddle. For one, all jewellers aren't listed in the Yellow Pages or equivalent thereof. For another: How sweet, Adi kept in touch with his blackmailer to find out where the goon sold a stolen necklace. Riiiggghhhttt. And finally, why the heck would any reputed jeweller answer that question truthfully to an absolute stranger over the phone?