Remove Sara from DT and Supervise Leviathan*EDITED - Page 6

Created

Last reply

Replies

82

Views

11.5k

Users

42

Likes

1.1k

Frequent Posters

871876 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#51

Originally posted by: CherryBlossoms.

Saraa once had a PM chat with my friend Olive_Rose where she admitted that she closed all the threads of a member named FairyLiquidSoap regardless of the content in her posts. 👏 Now what do you have to say about that Mr Vijay Bhatter? Now please don't tell me that isn't personal vendetta! 🥱




Sorry for posting this PM publically, but I think this PROVES that Cool Viewbie ~Saraa~ is indeed extremely biased and cannot stand a WORD against her favourite actor Barun Sobti. FairyLiquidSoap's threads have always criticised Sobti, however she always maintained full forum decorum and never broke any rules when she criticised actor(s). You can check out her posts

Now what's the guarantee that Cool Viewbie Saraa won't do this again in the future? In fact she holds a personal grudge against all members in the IPKKND forum who were part of the Basherz Dori. She raised almost all of their WLs more than 3 months ago and still hasn't reduced any one's yet. Not one single member's. And only one of them got a WL raise, after her 3 month period ended. Rest didn't and she didn't bother reducing their WL's too. 🥱

Example: Member Miss Cherie didn't get any WL raise even after her 3 month period, because according to Mr Vijay Bhatter members cannot get WL raise in review period which isn't mentioned in his new WL rules thread.🥱 But anyway, let's not digress. Point is, ~Saraa~ is a biased member since she even refused to lower Olive_Rose's WL, when she has not even received any new WL. Olive_Rose has maintained full forum decorum and didn't break any rules either. You can check out her posts if you don't believe me.

Now being a Mod, she is not supposed to behave with such impartialty towards a certain group of members regardless of what their reputation is in that particular section. She is a vindictive patronizing Mod, and such Mods shouldn't be on the DT. Period.

Being a mod doesn't give anybody the right to use their power in a wrong manner. Vijay, you should really make some rules for the Dev Team too, and make sure that they follow them. You should keep tabs on em like they do on the bashers. And if the rules ain't being followed then they're obviously not good enough.
872196 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#52

Originally posted by: CherryBlossoms.

Saraa once had a PM chat with my friend Olive_Rose where she admitted that she closed all the threads of a member named FairyLiquidSoap regardless of the content in her posts. 👏 Now what do you have to say about that Mr Vijay Bhatter? Now please don't tell me that isn't personal vendetta! 🥱




Sorry for posting this PM publically, but I think this PROVES that Cool Viewbie ~Saraa~ is indeed extremely biased and cannot stand a WORD against her favourite actor Barun Sobti. FairyLiquidSoap's threads have always criticised Sobti, however she always maintained full forum decorum and never broke any rules when she criticised actor(s). You can check out her posts

Now what's the guarantee that Cool Viewbie Saraa won't do this again in the future? In fact she holds a personal grudge against all members in the IPKKND forum who were part of the Basherz Dori. She raised almost all of their WLs more than 3 months ago and still hasn't reduced any one's yet. Not one single member's. And only one of them got a WL raise, after her 3 month period ended. Rest didn't and she didn't bother reducing their WL's too. 🥱

Example: Member Miss Cherie didn't get any WL raise even after her 3 month period, because according to Mr Vijay Bhatter members cannot get WL raise in review period which isn't mentioned in his new WL rules thread.🥱 But anyway, let's not digress. Point is, ~Saraa~ is a biased member since she even refused to lower Olive_Rose's WL, when she has not even received any new WL. Olive_Rose has maintained full forum decorum and didn't break any rules either. You can check out her posts if you don't believe me.

Now being a Mod, she is not supposed to behave with such impartialty towards a certain group of members regardless of what their reputation is in that particular section. She is a vindictive patronizing Mod, and such Mods shouldn't be on the DT. Period.



what the 😆😆😆
saraa what are you doing all this ??😆😆 this does not suits you if you are MOD of forum..😆😆

vijay this is not done at all.. remove saraa now from forum only ... public forum should not have biased member either.. mod to bahot dur ki baat he..😉

neutral members only could bring forum on right place😉
OnepoundChic thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 12 years ago
#53
😲
@bramcote46 its surprising to read how u'r saying you are not a part of any fandom.. ..actually its shocking 😆 ..but anyways none of my concern HERE!
Edited by OnepoundChic - 12 years ago
OnepoundChic thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 12 years ago
#54
i dun want to chat here but i see senorita sanaya here ..🤗 hope u doin' fine my friend va!!! 😳
751891 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#55
Allah Miyian what's wrong with the powers to be??😡 How much more evidence is needed to get rid of such biased DTs?????
angrybread thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
#56

Originally posted by: OnepoundChic

😲
@bramcote46 its surprising to read how u'r saying you are not a part of any fandom.. ..actually its shocking 😆 ..but anyways none of my concern HERE!


I didn't say i am not part of any fandom i said i am not part of only 1 fandom and there is a diff between both statements and it should not be shocking . Here is a copy of what i wrote:

I am not involved in only 1 fandom or show, neither i am part of any chat club or fan club , neither i have a large fangroup.
689471 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#57

Originally posted by: CherryBlossoms.

A member who used to be a part of IPKKND forum just passed some information against ~Saraa~. This member wishes to remain anonymous. She has told me that she once posted in the forum that she thinks "Sanaya could even make amazing chemistry with a goat". In IPKKND there was a goat in the show, named Laxmi. This member was referring to that goat when she said that. Now I am not sure if this member got her WL raised for it, but she was engaged in a heavy PM chat session with Cool Viewbie ~Saraa~ for this doing this. ~Saraa~ took it her comment the wrong way and thought this member was talking about Barun Sobti, however this member was talking about the actual goat Laxmi. These are some specific lines from Saraa's PMs to this member:


You may be talking about Lakshmi and I have no issues with that, but instead of writing "goat" you could have written Lakshmi, right? The intention of the post did not seem right at all. I was in that post as well, so I'm not being picky or anything like that. Especially, when you guys know that there is a strict watch being kept on all the threads, then I don't get what the problem is with being clear about your comment.

---------------------

You just gave me the right post. If you could write "But Sanaya had amazing chemistry even with Lakshmiji." in one post, couldn't you just say that in the others as well? You instead chose to instigate the BS fans.

---------------------

posts where you say that SI made even amazing chemistry with a goat is unclear and confusing to not just the members but the DT as well. Which is why I said in my previous post as well, that you may have written that in context to Lakshmi but you could have written "Lakshmi" instead of "Goat" could you have not?

^^ ~Saraa~'s PMs scream out that her fragile feelings were so badly hurt by this member's comment. 😛 She was harassing this member for her genuine comment which was made with no intention to instigate anyone. Just because she perceives this member was attacking BS or trying to instigate his fans, doesn't mean that is necessarily true. This PROVES that Mod Saraa can never look at comments/posts made with utmost objectivity and neutrality. She will always look at posts with the eyes of a fangirl, because frankly she is one. 😛 There is nothing wrong with being a fangirl, however it is not right when fangirls are appointed as Mods. Because when they are, they can't help but be biased and one-sided with their moderation.


Intention or Purpose: The reason for which something is done - REASON: Explanation or justification.

SEEM: To give an impression - IMPRESSION: a feeling or opinion about something or someone, esp. one formed without conscious thought or on

the basis of little evidence.


Right: Morally good, Justified or acceptable



So my question is:

How or why is a Topic on IPK forum viewed as morally wrong if the TM states that; "Sanaya can even make amazing chemistry with a goat?"

Unless the MOD in question:
  • had other thoughts on her mind
  • had her blinders on
  • was not reading in-context
  • decided to retire from moderation that day and be a fan-girl or
  • she was looking for something so she can pick on the TM.

That being said there was so much rape and po*nography displayed in the name of FFs floating around at the time but yet for all she spent wasted time on a harmless Topic when she should have been cleaning the immorality from the forum so that the fragile minds of the little 8-13 year old on this forum could be spared the horror🤢
47036 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#58
We have had enough of this Saarah. Just went through her pm and god dammit, I wonder which CM or GM is a Barun Phankheee to promote her from Viewbie to CoolViewbie position? Whatever it is, this Barun fangirl is immature, biased and totally unsuitable to moderate IPKKND forum considering the conflict of interest it gives rise to. Clearly her BS fangirl sentiments are too fragile to read even a slight criticism of some unprofessional actor...
Edited by IloveMyself. - 12 years ago
OnepoundChic thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 12 years ago
#59

Originally posted by: bramcote46


I didn't say i am not part of any fandom i said i am not part of only 1 fandom and there is a diff between both statements and it should not be shocking . Here is a copy of what i wrote:

I am not involved in only 1 fandom or show, neither i am part of any chat club or fan club , neither i have a large fangroup.


ok i am sorry it was a misunderstanding ..i really am!
angrybread thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
#60

Originally posted by: OnepoundChic


ok i am sorry it was a misunderstanding ..i really am!


No worries...i understand missing/misplacing a word can mean a totally different thing .

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".