Final Reminder for the forum members - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

39

Views

4.7k

Users

32

Likes

290

Frequent Posters

Jjoshim thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#11
This was much needed, coz as a reader too, one feels frustrated to see same pics in three four posts, on the same day. You keep on changing page nos. to find relevant/ interesting / in depth analytical topics that you tend to loose interest in forum. With slow Internet speeds it becomes frustrating forcing to close the web page!
352771 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#12
Alright here's my two cents on these 'rules'. Cannot call the post a pure shit because some rules like 'Spamming' and 'Member Protection' are emphasised so yea it's not completely trash but provision of the following 'rule' only makes it 'majorly' trash...and Omni quotes in red and answers in black.

"The forum is getting too much involved in talking about the actors in a wrong way, respect that they are doing their jobs and the creative process is getting involved in them"

Spare my ignorance but to reiterate times a million, I do not follow any crappy shows. However, occasionally, just for the tidbits of gossips and entertainment, I visit these soap forums. You know, e.g. If I wish to enquire about some two-timer or quitter, I'll take up my query straight to their respective forum. Coming to the point, the lead cast member (note how I didn't mention actress because I believe she has a long way to go before getting the title), known as Jennifer Winget has a wonderful personal life which draws in more attention than any of her work (which I consider to be crappy).

All I want to ask is how the term 'wrong' is defined by the Juhi Parmar fangirl CM of this section? If suppose the life of an actress is wrong per se (e.g she's a homewrecker and it's substantiated by the Telly Buzz article Do Say Bhaleey Teen), on which corner of India Forums can we discuss it if not here? Obviously if we want some more information on current wife of KSG, why cannot we discuss her life here? Puleeze. Do not even give this shit how the life is 'personal'. If its that personal, no articles on her life would have been put up on India Forums to begin with. Secondly, please quit resorting to a crappy excuse of fangirl sentiments being 'hurt'. Everyone should be mature enough to discuss and not neccessarily blindly lick the toes of celebs. I would conclude my post by simply asking 'Where should we discuss JW's home wrecking history' and leave it to be answered by the DTs.

PS by DTs I would like to exclude some Juhi Parmar fans because clearly I've no respect for them.The obsessive fangirl attitude I've experienced at their virtual hands in past is a good reason not to strike my head against the walls of IndiaForums. I would really appreciate an unbiased objective opinion and who could give it better than Deepz aka LUX?

#Freedom of Speech

Besides what in the blue hell is wrong with the tone of some Juhi Parmar Channel Moderators? Note how their each sentence ends with a open threat of increasing the Warning Level. Lol. Talk about carrying way too much of cyber pride. Sorry to burst some fangirlish bubbles but not everyone gives a flying duck about such cyber threats. Flaunting some cyber power and that too on a portal like India Forums doesn't make you invincible. It's pathetic how heavily the members are being moral policed. Try to tone down with the 'warnings' Puleeze. Deepz, even though you're a junior in terms of virtual rank but a piece of advise. Next time please draft any codes or framework all by yourself. More than the issue per se, the Channel Moderator's threatening tone is highly questionable for a member at that rank. Dammit. The DT position needs a fundamental change 🥱 4 out of the 5 points she makes, it ends with a virtual threat of increasing WL.
Come on now. A better option would be to take members in confidence and go for an effective dialogue rather than trying to intimidate them with you childish warning level threats. 🐷 Even if these WL threats are for some fanatics, you must make it visibly clear on your post because there are some who take this as a serious offence... Some who are called 'Hate-Mongers' and considered to have a 'sickening' humor by the virtual chulbul pandey.
Edited by Omnipotence - 12 years ago
870349 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#13
God have mercy on her

God have mercy on me

But let her be mine or let her burn 😉
Freethinker112 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#14
Why write so long a post when you basically meant,

"Worship like a fan or GTFO"

since you have deemed all other activities "inappropriate"?
rini_kat thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Networker 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#15

Originally posted by: Omnipotence

Alright here's my two cents on these 'rules'. Cannot call the post a pure shit because some rules like 'Spamming' and 'Member Protection' are emphasised so yea it's not completely trash but provision of the following 'rule' only makes it 'majorly' trash...and Omni quotes in red and answers in black.


"The forum is getting too much involved in talking about the actors in a wrong way, respect that they are doing their jobs and the creative process is getting involved in them"

Spare my ignorance but to reiterate times a million, I do not follow any crappy shows but occasionally, just for the tidbits of gossips and entertainment, I visit these soap forums. You know, e.g. If I wish to enquire about some two-timer or quitter, I'll take up my query straight to their respective forum. Coming to the point, the lead cast member (note how I didn't mention actress because I believe she has a long way to go before getting the title), known as Jennifer Winget has a wonderful personal life which draws in more attention than any of her work (which I consider to be crappy).

All I want to ask is how the term 'wrong' is defined by the DTs of this section? If suppose the life of an actres is wrong per se (e.g she's a homewrecker and it's substantiated by the Telly Buzz article Do Say Bhaleey Teen), on which corner of India Forums can we discuss it if not here? Obviously if we want some more information on current wife of KSG, why cannot we discuss her life here? Puleeze. Do not even give this shit how the life is 'personal'. If its that personal, no articles on her life would have been put up on India Forums to begin with. Secondly, please quit resorting to a crappy excuse of fangirl sentiments being 'hurt'. Everyone should be mature enough to discuss and not neccessarily blindly lick the toes of celebs. I would conclude my post by simply asking 'Where should we discuss JW's home wrecking history' and leave it to be answered by the DTs.

PS by DTs I would like to exclude some Juhi Parmar fans because clearly I've no respect for them because of the obsessive fangirl attitude I've experienced at their virtual hands in past. I would really appreciate an unbiased objective opinon abs who could give it better than Deepz aka LUX?

#Freedom of Speech

Besides what in the blue hell is wrong with the tone of some Juhi Parmar Channel Moderators? Note how their each sentence ends with a open threat of increasing the Warning Level. Lol. Talk about carrying way too much of cyber pride. Sorry to burst some fangirlish bubbles but not everyone gives a flying duck about such cyber threats. Flaunting some cyber power and that too on a portal like India Forums doesn't make you invincible. It's pathetic how heavily the members are being moral policed. Try to tone down with the 'warnings' Puleeze. Deepz, even though you're a junior in terms of virtual rank but a piece of advise. Next time please draft any codes or framework all by yourself. More than the issue per se, the Channel Moderator's threatening tone is highly questionable for a member at that rank. Dammit. The DT position needs a fundamental change 🥱


Agree with u...Here indiaforums always brings up chatapata news of the actor actress's life..but the admins refrained us frm not discussing them...If not discuss them why the hell they publish those news in this site.As far as I know that these articles are used in rating...on account of comments
671100 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#16

Originally posted by: *Resham*

Hello guys,


The forum is getting too much involved in talking about the actors in a wrong way, respect that they are doing their jobs and the creative process is getting involved in them. The forum also takes an opportunity to bash the members , so lets get rest assured on that as well that it will not happen ever. Otherwise WL's will be increased.


Enlighten me. what's wrong being mentioned here. Being a DT don't u know you should put everything clear on board for the new members to grasp what's so called 'wrong' being talked abt...😕

one thing is for sure - let's understand through a table

A DISCUSSION FORUM======personal lives of actors shall always be discussed no matter how many WL's you raise, because this is something you can't stop ======== members will always bash each other becoz if one stands against them then one shall always support, a friendship is hardly possible ======= members should be taught to learn criticism positively if else, take it in a way that the person criticising love the other's attitude. raising WL just the heck of it is never the answer ========= most of the actions are being taken on reports done by members. sometimes even DT takes actions on nonsensical reports, the DT should review and see what's wrong before closing the entire thread ====== the rules shall always be challenged until they are in proper order.

that's my two cents on this final reminder.

P>S. i don't watch this serial and hardly know abt its actors. just this final reminder thing brought me to this forum. lol 😆
Edited by Neetu_Unleashed - 12 years ago
prabbs thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 12 years ago
#17
There are articles and personal pics of these actors published every day in the respective forums,which does give the members something to talk about.
I don't understand, why not publish only articles which discusses shows and not actors personal lives.
If this is indeed a forum, there is always two faces to it, criticism and endorsing, that may get carried over to personal lives of actors and not just their shows.
If the forum does follow the norms of posting news just about shows and actors on those shows, and stop posting clips, pics or articles, what these actors are doing outside their show , then the members will take the lead.
Edited by prabba - 12 years ago
Dhoxi thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 12 years ago
#18
Wasn't this IF mean to be an open forum where members are here just for their fav actors? so how can't we not post picture or do as we want to. I know there are certain rules but it's like far way too much... Like how come we can't post pictures? 😕

And also I agree with omni 👍🏼
BullsEye777 thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 12 years ago
#19

Originally posted by: -Deepzz-

Thanks for posting the Warning Resham .


Members must realize , quality posts , which give scope for good healthy debate will help increase activity and ranking automatically. Spamming same stuff about ranks and countdowns just push good topics in back pages and new visitors or members may be put off as they have nothing to comment about .

We do want members to have fun but it can be done in moderation. Why open too many threads on same topics. It will not help in ranking. It just clutters the forum .

And another cause of concern is talks of Jen and Gautam offscreen. Why should it matter to anybody if they are friends or not offscreen.🥱 She is married lady and Gautam is just her co worker . Posts regarding offscreen speculation just breeds fights between the fans .



Wanting to know everything about an actor you like is very usual. You must be also keeping tabs to be able to so confidently say that Gautam is just a co-worker😳
689471 thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#20
I really don't get this final reminder thingy I constantly see since joining the portal a few years ago. Is it really FINAL?

Like seriously is it going to stop people from speaking about celebrities in a "WRONG WAY"?

Is there really wrong and right ways of speaking about a "celebrity"?
What constitutes wrong and right ways..., perspectives maybe but one will differ vastly from another.

So is it right to "Threaten"...,"Warn" individuals for opinions and news that are not their own but basically public news?

So say the Tabloid said Jennifer wrecked her present husband's first marriage and let's say I want to discuss this where can I do it?

It's quite obvious I can't discuss it with the Tabloid or Jennifer herself so it will have to be with forum friends init? So where can we speak about it and mind you we are not spreading rumours but merely reading the news and adding our two cents. So why the warning...?

Lets not be hypocrites we all like a bit of gossip..., and a juicy bit of journalism not yellow ones as if it were the case those Tabloids will be shut down long ago.

If those so called celebrities choose to put their business on the street like traffic why blame others when they speak about them? As they say, If you were not there then your name won't call.
Edited by Olive_Rose - 12 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".