Hodge Podge Dialogue

Originally posted by: Laila2009

What are the writers suggesting that if these men were drunk it would be OK for them to do that and that all should be forgiven? Writers what on earth are you getting at? Your lines make ZERO sense.

Originally posted by: Praise...

Very well said ...

Originally posted by: Laila2009

The last scene between Gauri and her mother made no sense. The mother affirms that Gauri has not had the love of a father and brother and what Rudra did left her confused? What does she mean it left her confused? Er, I don't know what confusion there is because a father and brother does NOT kiss a fellow female in the household this way!!! What are the writers suggesting that if these men were drunk it would be OK for them to do that and that all should be forgiven? Writers what on earth are you getting at? Your lines make ZERO sense.

Here is my interpretation of what happened. First and foremost, Rudra mistook Gauri for Pihu. Gauri obviously has (unconsciously) feelings for Rudra, it appears to the viewer at first Gauri is taken back by Rudra's words perhaps thinking those words were meant for her. She's quite clearly further astonished when he comes forward to embrace and kiss her; she doesn't fight back aggressively because part of her is somewhat welcoming it (part of her fancies him). She's upset when she hears him say Pihu's name because at that point she knows what is going on that he's thinking it is Pihu and this affection is not meant for her. It can be pretty heart-breaking as it is double slap in the face. This premise can be supported, when, for a moment, she does look at herself in the mirror after washing her face and touches it reminiscing of what happened in a pensive manner of confusion.

The lines between Gauri and her mother should clearly have suggested that she valued Rudra's friendship because she had never had a father or brother in her life and she welcomed Rudra as a male figure in her life. She was disheartened that in a state of drunkness he had mistaken her for his lover and tried to make advances towards her. But the writers did not say this clearly and made a hodge podge mess instead.

As for forgiveness? That depends on the person and the relationship the person has with the friend who behaves this way and it should be based on two points a) that the person sincerly made the mistake and b) they acknowledge what they did was wrong.

I hate the idea that the writers are indirectly implying that if a father or brother does what Rudra did in a state of drunkardness we should forgive it and let it ago. I've seen one too many cases of sexual abuse where the father or brother has used this to get off and it's quite evident they knew what they were doing.

Second, the fact is that no matter HOW drunk you are (and I speak from experience), you do not make out or got to sleep with someone you don't like or mistake them for someone else!!!! Unless you've got some roofies mixed in with that drink it's pretty tough to not know. O, I don't use or have ever had roofies in my drink(s).

Originally posted by: Laila2009

The last scene between Gauri and her mother made no sense. The mother affirms that Gauri has not had the love of a father and brother and what Rudra did left her confused? What does she mean it left her confused? Er, I don't know what confusion there is because a father and brother does NOT kiss a fellow female in the household this way!!! What are the writers suggesting that if these men were drunk it would be OK for them to do that and that all should be forgiven? Writers what on earth are you getting at? Your lines make ZERO sense.

Here is my interpretation of what happened. First and foremost, Rudra mistook Gauri for Pihu. Gauri obviously has (unconsciously) feelings for Rudra, it appears to the viewer at first Gauri is taken back by Rudra's words perhaps thinking those words were meant for her. She's quite clearly further astonished when he comes forward to embrace and kiss her; she doesn't fight back aggressively because part of her is somewhat welcoming it (part of her fancies him). She's upset when she hears him say Pihu's name because at that point she knows what is going on that he's thinking it is Pihu and this affection is not meant for her. It can be pretty heart-breaking as it is double slap in the face. This premise can be supported, when, for a moment, she does look at herself in the mirror after washing her face and touches it reminiscing of what happened in a pensive manner of confusion.

The lines between Gauri and her mother should clearly have suggested that she valued Rudra's friendship because she had never had a father or brother in her life and she welcomed Rudra as a male figure in her life. She was disheartened that in a state of drunkness he had mistaken her for his lover and tried to make advances towards her. But the writers did not say this clearly and made a hodge podge mess instead.

As for forgiveness? That depends on the person and the relationship the person has with the friend who behaves this way and it should be based on two points a) that the person sincerly made the mistake and b) they acknowledge what they did was wrong.

I hate the idea that the writers are indirectly implying that if a father or brother does what Rudra did in a state of drunkardness we should forgive it and let it ago. I've seen one too many cases of sexual abuse where the father or brother has used this to get off and it's quite evident they knew what they were doing.

Second, the fact is that no matter HOW drunk you are (and I speak from experience), you do not make out or got to sleep with someone you don't like or mistake them for someone else!!!! Unless you've got some roofies mixed in with that drink it's pretty tough to not know. O, I don't use or have ever had roofies in my drink(s).

Originally posted by: sv06

And somehow, considering that they live in a conservative town and amidst such horrid neighbours, esp the males, Gouri's mother allowing her daughter to go to her new male friends' house in the middle of the night, knowing that he drinks, didn't sit well with me.
She,who is against her daughter singing, is fine with this !!
Just my pov.