Originally posted by: Amritavarshini
It it true that a simple song sung well is better than a tough song sung badly. But having said that, it is important in a competition to show how well one can sing difficult songs. It is like the diving competition in the Olympics. A diver can make a simple dive and land perfectly without splashing a whole lot of water, and another diver might attempt a very difficult dive and not have the same finish, but there ia a factor given for difficulty and that is taken into account while giving marks.
For eg. Level of difficulty say is a 5 on a 1 to 10 scale
and again on a 1 to 10 scale you have the quality of singing. If a person sang a song with difficulty factor 5 perfectly, they get a 50, while if a person sang a song with difficulty factor 8 and sang it so-so, getting a 7 on the singing ability, they still get a 56.
That is precisely why Vaishali and Sagar got out.
I have judged many music competitions and that is how I give marks. But if a singer attempts a very very difficult song and murders it, he/she gets 10 * 0 and that had happened in a competition that I have judged also!
This way of evaluation will be always under dispute. Someone who has been practicing a particular published song whether easy or difficult , will always find that song easier to sing. One who has been practicing only so called difficult songs will find it uneasy to sing something which is considered easy and not so heavy.
I am of the same opinion as "Udit Narayan" when he says "Mera Kehna Mano, Gana Koi Bhi easy nehi hote".
I can find only one perfect solution, make everyone sing the same song. it might be boring but question of easy Vs difficult will not be there anymore. I am sure, we will get a higher degree of unpredictability with single song process.