Dilsher made a mistake

Page

Next Last

Sneha Nair

@snehatalk

Voyager

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

Complications! Complications!

Even though i loved today's episode i have question for all of you guys? Why did Dilsher tell everyone that Paro is Rudra's hone wali bahu ie Fiancee? Wouldnt it be prudent to tell everyone she was Rudra's newly wedded wife...i mean Dilsher didnt know that his brother would recognize Paro...and even if he did am sure he wouldnt have spilled the beans...Besides if you are already lying then why do it half way...Now he has to come up with a genuine reason as to why Paro...Rudra's fiancee was sharing a room with Rudra before marriage...the question still stands...if she had been declared as his newly wedded wife...none of this explanations would have been required...right?

Sometimes i dont see where the cvs are going with certain track...Can any of you think of a reason why Dilsher said Fiancee and not Wife?

Is it because dilsher hopes to get Rudra convinced to really legalize the relationship in front of everyone? or is there some thing more to it?

Edited by snehatalk - 11 years ago

Quote

Frequent Posters

Shriya Shyam

@Forumuser_

Voyager

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

If Dilsher had introduced Paro as Rudra's wife, then the so called 'Rudra's Parivaar vaale' cannot force them to Marry, which is most probably the upcoming track. So Dilsher was right after all.

Edited by Sripriya_5 - 11 years ago

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

TheMogambo

@TheMogambo

Rocker

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

maybe...she is not wearing the mangalsutra or sindoor...obviously that must hav been the question of masi..."if they r married...where r these things..."

Quote

Aruni.

@Aruni.

Dazzler

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

She did not have mangalsutra and sindoor put on, did she?

Quote

prettypri

@prettypri

Rocker

Posted: 11 years ago

Why would rudra's wife be hiding in the room? He would have introduced her right.

This is also complicated but!

Quote

ArnavKhushijodi

@ArnavKhushijodi

Dazzler

+ 5

Posted: 11 years ago

I was thinking the same thing but maybe the CVs in this manner wanted to introduce Parud wedding track! 😕😛

Quote

Aruni.

@Aruni.

Dazzler

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: TheMogambo
maybe...she is not wearing the mangalsutra or sindoor...obviously that must hav been the question of masi..."if they r married...where r these things..."

telepathy alert 😆 LOL ur DP btw

Quote

CheshireBilli

@CheshireBilli

Dazzler

+ 7

Posted: 11 years ago

Probably to avoid questions about her lack of mangalsutra and sindoor, her antecedents, proof of a wedding ceremony, and questions about the need to hide her away.

I don't know, honestly. Logic aur desi soaps ka 36 ka aakhra rehta hai. 😆

Quote

TheMogambo

@TheMogambo

Rocker

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: aruni50218

telepathy alert 😆 LOL ur DP btw

rabba ve,,,,😉

Quote

SStephy

@SStephy

Dazzler

+ 3

Posted: 11 years ago

#10

I guess then he would be questioned as to why she doesn't have any sindoor or mangalsutra on... this would have made sense if Paro was in her bridal attire... but then such questions against her character and the need to lie would not have risen. Whichever way we look at... a lie is a lie and always leads into a fix...

Quote

1 2

Dilsher made a mistake

Related Topics

Explore Topics