@ janki i have already posted my views in the thread its my personal view i m not at all judgemental u should watch the show may be u like it
@piu to hell with the BG music we know how many time gulaal's signature tunes have been used in other shows and ppl went gaga over there...its so natural to copy the BG ...the sets are also not an issue we cant expect them to buy acres of land and create their own set neither the production houses matter as long as the things are in the line they claimed..its clearly mentioned in the ramcharitmanas that wedding was grand affair the roads were watered by rosewater and rosepetal was spread everywhere.to witness the wedding god and demons descended down...and tell me instead of all this what we get the wedding is done in haste almost in a day (who said that)...and.king janak was more interested in inquiring the dancer how shabby was it and then suinaina didnt even welcomed the baarat it ...in ramcharitmanas suinaina and the mandavi mother welcomed the baarat and suinaina was so engrossed at looking lord rama lakshman bharat and shtrughan tht she couldnt take her eyes off of him and looking at him she realised the moksha this was the grand description of wedding and the relation between MIL and SIL and here we see MIL threatening to commit suicide if lord rama weds sitaji wht the hell ! isnt it clear that lord rama already claimed sitaji by breaking the dhanush now no mother can ask her daughter to do so... In DKDM the equation was different and they exactly followed wht was written in puranas copying the same here for the creepy saas element is disgusting y the hell they forgot this is ramayana here each and every character is pious... if ram was perfect son in law suinaina was perfect mother in law and then they have really not protrayed sita's character well in each epi i see her shedding lots of tears...sita was nt crying baby as they are protraying her she is goddess they should make her look like one... strong calm and composite one ...the divinity in sita maa is missing
and now coming to the naksharata lord rama kundli was mangalik is more of myth it was nothing like that the person born on the ramnavami can never be mangalik its clearly stated in the jyotish shastra so how come lord rama was mangalik...infact the lord rama and sita wedding nakshatra and lord shiva and parvati maa wedding nakshatra are considered most auspicious nakshatra the wedding done on this nakshatra is conidered "subh" i m not sure but did u saw parneeta where the nakshartra was such that wedding could be done by exchanging garland its actually the uttar phalguni nakshatra or maybe the lord shiva or parvati one not so sure...and vishwamitra was a great astrologer his contribution to jyotsih shaashtra is immense with his presence it is impossible to confer tht auspicious moment passed and tht coz these holy sages i'e. vishwamitra and vashishta were engrossed in watching apsara dance (eww ) it just like umpire forgetting the game of cricket and instead drool on the gorgeous girl among the audience really degrades the holy sages of that time...the wedding took place at auspicious moment and then there was a solar eclipse due to which sita couldnt enter the ayodhya at the right mahurat and as the result there was a separation which is feebly mentioned in valmiki ramayana (the major source of ramayana itself)
and now on apsara dance less say is better...the dance was shabby and the movement was clumpsy and diviyanka gesture werent that of a bharatnatyam dancer it wasnt decent and graceful either
lakshman and urmila scene i know urmila wasnt mentioned in valmiki and tulsidas ramayana so i gave the freedom of creativity to the writers...it is actually pleasant suprise to see they actually taking interest in urmila and lakshmana bond as if a person goes by ramcharitmanas he will conclude lakshmana as great brother but a unfair husband the sources of lakshmana and urmila are present in folktales and some of them are contained in telgu and bengali literature the stories themselves were so interesting after reading it one can safely say urmila and laskhman were ideal husband and wife urmila was a dharampatni as she truly obeyed her husband orders never once defied or argued on the contrary to sitamaa who wanted to accompany lord rama to forest lakshmana was a ideal husband in urmila sleep a famous telgu poem lakshmana confessed that he loved his wife so much tht he cant sleep and eat properly in her memories he used to remember her every single night he kept awake and was able to guard ramji and sitaji he said her moonlike face never made him look at any other woman and tht if she wont forgive him he wont live for another second and now could u think such person can ever be rude to his future wife...helll
and chalo jaane do i have already written a essay on it...okies me going i m not here to spread negativity or things like that...my rant is sabotaging the character of ramcharitmanas no sage will engross themseves in apsara dance and forgot the mahurat no mother will compel her daughter to break the marriage that already took place the wedding of ram and sita was formality as she belonged to him the day she put garland around lord rama ' neck... i know lots of ppl are enjoying the show so let them mein chup rahungi
and i m done with all the versions of ramayana abhi mein ramayana to bilkul nahi dekhne waali chalo bye seeya🤗
Edited by arti07 - 13 years ago
Cricket
Current Affairs
Shiv Shakti
Ye Hai Mohabbatein
