Sleet of Emotional Quivers on RadhaKrishn Eternal Love CC # 8 - Page 104

Between episode dekha hehe

Originally posted by: vyapti

I consider Krishna a historical figure (A character based on a historical figure to be precise). Even if we do not agree on that, Mahabharata was written more than 1500 years ago. So we have to take the social norms of that time into consideration.

I am not advocating for the show. As you know, I love to observe a thing from different perspectives.

Cool.

So did you understand this point ?---->

Okk. Trying your language ----

It was a hypothesis where I considered it as a set not intersecting the set mentioned in the instagram post.

She said ----- scriptures relevance is not important. And if not seen from that perspective, it's a good show.

So HYPOTHETICALLY I considered this from that reference frame ( omitting the mythological relevance ) and pointed out that even from the contemporary angle, this show is nonsensical.

Originally posted by: stormborn

Cool.

So did you understand this point ?---->

Okk. Trying your language ----

It was a hypothesis where I considered it as a set not intersecting the set mentioned in the instagram post.

She said ----- scriptures relevance is not important. And if not seen from that perspective, it's a good show.

So HYPOTHETICALLY I considered this from that reference frame ( omitting the mythological relevance ) and pointed out that even from the contemporary angle, this show is nonsensical.

I understood your point. But could not make my point clear.

It is a fanfiction based on scriptures. Fanfictions deviate from scriptures.

But even after omitting all the points we have to consider the time frame. We have to remember that at that time polygamy was the rule monogamy was the exception. And dissect the characters accordingly.

Else many respected figures of 19th century India may be called a pedophile, as they married children.

I do agree with you that the show is bullshit but if you take the time frame into account and argue accordingly your point will be more strong.

Originally posted by: vyapti

I understood your point. But could not make my point clear.

It is a fanfiction based on scriptures. Fanfictions deviate from scriptures.

But even after omitting all the points we have to consider the time frame. We have to remember that at that time polygamy was the rule monogamy was the exception. And dissect the characters accordingly.

Else many respected figures of 19th century India may be called a pedophile, as they married children.

I do agree with you that the show is bullshit but if you take the time frame into account and argue accordingly your point will be more strong.

Have you read the full instagram post ?

If yes then please explain how including the polygamy angle would have made my point against that post stronger.

Originally posted by: stormborn

Have you read the full instagram post ?

Yes.

I think she considers the show as a fanfiction as Shrikrishnakirtan or Amish Tripathi's books.

Even if we consider the show as completely fictional--

At contemporary time we do not fight with arrows and maces. People who fought with arrows and maces were usually polygamous.

Originally posted by: vyapti

Yes.

I think she considers the show as a fanfiction as Shrikrishnakirtan or Amish Tripathi's books.

Even if we consider the show as completely fictional--

At contemporary time we do not fight with arrows and maces. People who fought with arrows and maces were usually polygamous.

Arrows and maces were completely irrelevant to the point I was making. I only talked about relationships and without even considering the polygamy angle, the characters could be proven shitty enough according to the decisions they have taken. And that character assessment was independent of the timeline.

Polygamy was an arrow for my bow which I chose not to use coz it was not needed.

Originally posted by: stormborn

Arrows and maces were completely irrelevant to the point I was making. I only talked about relationships and without even considering the polygamy angle, the characters could be proven shitty enough according to the decisions they have taken. And that character assessment was independent of the timeline.

Polygamy was an arrow for my bow which I chose not to use coz it was not needed.

"Not even mentioning the other wives as I am considering this as a non-mytho contemporary show and polygamy is not legal in current times."---My problem was with this.

Looks like R-K will be connected through video chat.

TBH I am liking the ambience until now.

Dwarka ocean seems like only has jellyfish now. Voyeurish machhliya lagta hai mar gaye....

Originally posted by: vyapti

"Not even mentioning the other wives as I am considering this as a non-mytho contemporary show and polygamy is not legal in current times."---My problem was with this.

Yah that I got.

But u talked like I stated it as some fact whereas I clearly mentioned -- 'I am considering' i.e. I chose to speak in a hypothetical scenario.

My problem was with -- you talking about a hypothesis as if it were a fact claimed by me.