Radha-Krishn (Sumedh/Mallika) Appreciation Thread #7

First Previous

Page

118

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Aarti

@TheSilverDoe

Voyager

Posted: 6 years ago

#141

Originally posted by: Mishti_Dahi
I know some other version of ranchodd ^ 😕

Kalyavan one?

Quote

Aarti

@TheSilverDoe

Voyager

Posted: 6 years ago

#142

Originally posted by: RadhaKrishna_19
Thanks for the info Arti Di 🤗 ❤️.
Today Raasleela was very good as compared to previous ones. Both dancing and multiple forms of Krishna❤️.

I am surprised that Sumedh dances 1000 times better than me 😆.

Bold - I liked thay scene. Because in real Maharas, there was one Krishna with every Gopi. This reminded me of that. 😳

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Aarti

@TheSilverDoe

Voyager

Posted: 6 years ago

#143

Am I the only one who didn't like when Krishna blamed Sita for Sita haran in yesterday's Krishn vaani?

Real Krishna can never ever blame Sita.

He never blamed Draupadi in Mahabharata. He doesn't have victim blaming mentality.

Edited by Aarti_ - 6 years ago

Quote

Mahi-Ve-108

@Mahi-Ve-108

Navigator

Posted: 6 years ago

#144

Originally posted by: Aarti_
Am I the only one who didn't like when Krishna blamed Sita for Sita haran in yesterday's Krishn vaani?
Real Krishna can never ever blame Sita.
He never blamed Draupadi in Mahabharata. He doesn't have victim blaming mentality.

I dont comment much but when I saw this I thought I should answer.

Ya I didnt like it too but I think it was to promote that new show that started Ek tha Rani Ek tha Ravan.

Becuase Krishna cant directly say "hey go watch the show" they found a way to smash it into the vani since this show is their most popular.

It did not sound as inspirational as the other vanis so that is the only reasoning I can think of. That can be the only reason it sounded like he was blaming (for the exact reasons you said). It was out of character.

Edited by Janu808 - 6 years ago

Quote

Aarti

@TheSilverDoe

Voyager

Posted: 6 years ago

#145

Originally posted by: Janu808

I dont comment much but when I saw this I thought I should answer.
Ya I didnt like it too but I think it was to promote that new show that started Ek tha Rani Ek tha Ravan.
Becuase Krishna cant directly say "hey go watch the show" they found a way to smash it into the vani since this show is their most popular.
It did not sound as inspirational as the other vanis so that is the only reasoning I can think of. That can be the only reason it sounded like he was blaming (for the exact reasons you said). It was out of character.

If that was to promote new show, they should put Sita out of it.

This is the only krishn vaani I disliked .

It did sound like victim blaming. Totally out of character for Krishna .

Quote

Mahi-Ve-108

@Mahi-Ve-108

Navigator

Posted: 6 years ago

#146

Originally posted by: Aarti_
If that was to promote new show, they should put Sita out of it.
This is the only krishn vaani I disliked .
It did sound like victim blaming. Totally out of character for Krishna .

It was I totally agree I didnt like it either but that is the only reason I can think of (terrible reason but still something other than they brought krishna out of character). Still a bit disappointed with it.

If i am not mistaken I think there was another vani on women before and it was much better. (I think there was a vani my memory is so bad my mind could be making up something 😆)

Quote

Aarti

@TheSilverDoe

Voyager

Posted: 6 years ago

#147

Yes there was vaani on woman before and it was great.

He told in that vaani to give respect to woman. Respect makes them more happy than gifts.

And yesterday's was unbelievable 😕

Quote

Sumi

@RadhaKrishna_19

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 6 years ago

#148

Even I agree with both of you, as Janu said it was solely to promote the new show but in the attempt they made Krishna OOC. This was the first Vaani which was very confusing and unsatisfactory. Their intention might be good but the execution went badly wrong. I agree with words that due to Sita's chatisty, Ravan couldn't even touch her but it was purely not her fault to get kidnapped. It was all Ravan's fault to lay down his hands on wife of Ram. What if even saying no by woman, a man still tries to cross his line by disrespecting her?

There was no answer.

The only part I agreed was that disrespecting a woman is a greatest sin and the last part in which he said that we should respect a lady because she gives birth, etc.

And the last two vaanis on woman have been commendable.

1. We should respect a woman personally as well as infront of society.

2. Don't love a woman just because of her physical beauty, love her soul as the son of even ugly woman calls her most beautiful because of the strong connection between mother and son.

But yesterday was a no from my side.

Quote

diksha710

@diksha710

Dazzler

+ 7

Posted: 6 years ago

#149

I thought I was the only one who did not agree with the Vaani for the most part

Quote

Madhuri

@Viswasruti

Moderator

+ 29

Posted: 6 years ago

#150

I agree with Aarti , and Diksha and Sumi too .

Krishna was a humanist in general and a feminist at core. He always supported every woman in his life, esp Draupadi, Subhadra, and all his wives and their sentiments.

Whether you recognized that goof up or not, in one of his Krishna Vanis he mentioned a glass of water ... there wasn't a word like Glass at that time , glass is an English word ! Somehow I am not comfortable with Krishna Vanis , ghuma ghumake Ke they are trying to say the same thing, which is reducing the character's core values. At times it looked a bit odd , esp when he teases and playing magic with his fingers and trying to confuse Radha , immediately after that scene , this so-called philosophical discourse. These Vani's are not at par with Krishna's stature. Don't want to hurt anyone's feelings, just shared my inner thoughts.😊

Quote

1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 ... 118

Radha

Radha-Krishn (Sumedh/Mallika) Appreciation Thread #7 - Page 15

Related Topics

Explore Topics