Radha-Krishn (Sumedh /Mallika) Appreciation Thread #6 - Page 81

Created

Last reply

Replies

1.1k

Views

73k

Users

21

Likes

2.2k

Frequent Posters

RadhaKrishna_19 thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 6 years ago

Originally posted by: Janakivallav

Sumi do u have any HQ pics of Raaslila snaps of trio n RK

HQ caps toh nahi mil paa rahe the thodi derr pehle kyuki 50% se jyada net used ho gaya😳. Mai kal post karungi 😃.
AayaTohModiJi thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
ha kal post kar do no hurry...
Sumi...

@Daakshayani do u think Vrishbhanu was like this ,I mean father of MahaLakshmi like this...m not getting this
Ayan married or not Radha as per folklore other story but here cv's twist too much
RadhaKrishna_19 thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 6 years ago
I just hope my word doesn't become true. If not hate, the more broad upcoming track is anger and it is proven in today's episode.I don't want to see Radha scowling every now and then.
Ab toh yeh haalat ho gayi hai ki Balram Krishna se jyada pareshaan lag raha hai aur mujhe uski jyada chinta ho rahi hai ki woh yeh Radha aur Ayan ki shaadi kaise dekhega.Feeling bad for both of them, phas gaye hai dono. Aakhir Krishna bhi har jagah apni maaya use nahi kar sakte naa, kuch niyati bhi hoti hai .
PandavPranayini thumbnail
8th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago

Originally posted by: Janakivallav



@Daakshayani do u think Vrishbhanu was like this ,I mean father of MahaLakshmi like this...m not getting this
Ayan married or not Radha as per folklore other story but here cv's twist too much


I personally don't believe Radha married Ayan, as the scriptures too suggest she stayed unmarried. There wasn't even a need for this particular character in this show, as we don't even know he existed or not. 😆

Vrishbhaan, though doesn't have a character sketch of his own in the scriptures, he wasn't supposed to be like this as you have mentioned. He is the father of Mahalakshmi's avatar.

Viswasruti thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
First , what does it mean ghrina or whatever it maybe ?? 😕
First , Moh to hona hai naa , to vimukth hone kaa from it ???😕 Where is Moh ??
A tender heart is yearning for love, a young girl's soul is eager to unite with it's God , a maiden is mad at her musical enchanter, a tune is flowing towards music to become a lovely symphony, first, let them show a few scenes of association, then anyway this crooked duo will get the praise catch to hold her in their clutches for life !!
Today Balram represented all the viewers, I loved his every dialogue and expression, he is more humane than all these divine beings!

AayaTohModiJi thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago

Originally posted by: PandavPranayini


I personally don't believe Radha married Ayan, as the scriptures too suggest she stayed unmarried. There wasn't even a need for this particular character in this show, as we don't even know he existed or not. 😆

Vrishbhaan, though doesn't have a character sketch of his own in the scriptures, he wasn't supposed to be like this as you have mentioned. He is the father of Mahalakshmi's avatar.

U & Me think same for me RadhaKrishna same with two bodies ...
n don't remind me , didn't get my reply from Un that which script he is following for that fellow...he is obsessed with him
that is the point...Mother of MahaLakshmi Avtar will be different than this...
jag ko prem kaise iye cvs sikhayenge don't know its turning khichdi now days
RadhaKrishna_19 thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 6 years ago
The CVs are really confusing the viewers. Aaj sab log KaRam scene pe ro rahe hai Twitter pe😭. And yes, here is me with a frown on my face.
Krishna aur Dau dono rone lag gaye 😭.

*Aapne saugandh de di, mai kahan jaa sakta hu!*
😭

Krishna and Dau helpless.
Edited by RadhaKrishna_19 - 6 years ago
Viswasruti thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago

Originally posted by: PandavPranayini


I personally don't believe Radha married Ayan, as the scriptures too suggest she stayed unmarried. There wasn't even a need for this particular character in this show, as we don't even know he existed or not. 😆

Vrishbhaan, though doesn't have a character sketch of his own in the scriptures, he wasn't supposed to be like this as you have mentioned. He is the father of Mahalakshmi's avatar.

Bold-- Golden words !🤗 Ayan's existence was almost nonexistent in scriptures, Ayan was a passive character, just was there, a Kali bhakth, and he too loved Radha Krishna love and considered it as Divine love. There wasn't any question from him to probe Radha . Why these CVs are so obsessive about this Ayan story and making him all-important character and his mother as all-powerful one !!
Today's episode was not convincingly correct! When he was in Brindavan , Krishna was not a thinker, he was flamboyant and highly romantic, loving Radha and mesmerizing all the Gopis with his melodious music and dance. Radha learned the real meaning of love only after left behind by Krishna there , then only Moh mukth , prem pana was possible for her !
sambhavami thumbnail
Posted: 6 years ago
^These guys are following the Bengali folklores. Even their make-up and general approach is familiar to me. 😳
RadhaKrishna_19 thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 6 years ago

Originally posted by: Radhikerani

^These guys are following the Bengali folklores. Even their make-up and general approach is familiar to me. 😳

Can you describe it? 😳

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".