tanishtha i was the one who referred to nitish bharadwaj's casting as krishna.... this is what i had written -
i am not saying that angad is bad.. i am saying that rajat is too good to replace and that i dont feel angad is a good replacement.. i am sure they could have searched better and done better..
e.g. we had lovely lovely casted Ram with Arun Govil and amazing Krishna with Nitish Bharadwaj.. all people needed to see was one glance of them and they were convinced that they are perfect Rams and Krishnas (this was even before people started watching episodes full fledged).. similarly about rajat.. one glance and he looked perfect junior PRC (even before people started realising his acting talents)
most dont feel the same about Angad [if what i felt was not true can you explain why most of them - 'even those who are not crazily crazy of rajat' feel similarly about angad]😛
i never said that the sagars launched nitish. i know that mahabharat was made by the chopras... i was just generally referring to historical casting.... all i said was that excellent adults like arun govil and nitish bharadwaj were introduced who melted people's hearts at first sight which angad bedi has not done so far. 😊
Edited by lashy - 18 years ago