A Few words. - Page 2

I didn't like it today. So many double standards. I knew already that Prats would refuse to help Baba, and while she did do the right thing this time, it just reminded me again of the time Prof had gone to jail. He was at fault, he was guilty of murder, and Prats went to help him without a second thought.

Originally posted by: elle45

I didn't like it today. So many double standards. I knew already that Prats would refuse to help Baba, and while she did do the right thing this time, it just reminded me again of the time Prof had gone to jail. He was at fault, he was guilty of murder, and Prats went to help him without a second thought.

Krishna, though guilty, is in for a lesser offence. Now why isn't Prats helping him? If she can forgive murder, then why not a beating? Why does she turn a blind eye where her father is involved? Somehow when I think of all this, I find her bashans have little credibility.

Originally posted by: yemi3006

If i wasn't following this serial for a long time, i would say its for the same reason Komal is questioning her mother how she can come bail out her son when she had said she didn't feel comfortable going to jail on behalf of Adarsh ... blood really is thicker than water.

However, i think the answer to your question is that the CVs are not that concerned with continuity regarding stuff like that ... see, the whole prof in jail thingy was last year, we are supposed to forget that it happened the way it did and what each character did or said 😛😆

On a more serious note, the crew turnover is really messing with the credibility of their characters since it appears the actors themselves have no power to protest when it appears the character is being compromised

Originally posted by: elle45

I didn't like it today. So many double standards. I knew already that Prats would refuse to help Baba, and while she did do the right thing this time, it just reminded me again of the time Prof had gone to jail. He was at fault, he was guilty of murder, and Prats went to help him without a second thought.

Krishna, though guilty, is in for a lesser offence. Now why isn't Prats helping him? If she can forgive murder, then why not a beating? Why does she turn a blind eye where her father is involved? Somehow when I think of all this, I find her bashans have little credibility.

U put up a very valid point here that I completely forgot about. Honestly I am still confused as to how did Prof was let off from his crime...He did let angad's hands off after remembering all the hard times Angad gave...so he did commit a murder...and how exactly does pratigya's kidnapping truth prove that prof was innocent?? 🤔..of course all these questions were forgotten as we had more important issues like krishna knowing the truth and his reactions...Looking back...she not only let off prof for the murder but also adarsh who infact committed the same crime as krishna...Eeven Adarsh was provoked by angad and he was out to attack him ..infact there was a fight as well...So when Pratigya can understand Adarsh's stance then why not Krishna's??...If a well educated and "cultured" guy full of principles can do this so can't she understand krishna's temperament??...I am not defending Krishna's actions at all...legally he was wrong...but can every situation be judged taken law into account??...

Originally posted by: elle45

I didn't like it today. So many double standards. I knew already that Prats would refuse to help Baba, and while she did do the right thing this time, it just reminded me again of the time Prof had gone to jail. He was at fault, he was guilty of murder, and Prats went to help him without a second thought.

Krishna, though guilty, is in for a lesser offence. Now why isn't Prats helping him? If she can forgive murder, then why not a beating? Why does she turn a blind eye where her father is involved? Somehow when I think of all this, I find her bashans have little credibility.

👏👏...I want to see consistency Pratz, when it comes to wrongful doing. She forgave her father, then her sister. This is her husband she should stand by her man in public...behind close door give him the third degree.

Originally posted by: mia12

👏👏...I want to see consistency Pratz, when it comes to wrongful doing. She forgave her father, then her sister. This is her husband she should stand by her man in public...behind close door give him the third degree.

Exactly... if not stand by in public...atleast bail him out and then give him third degree behind close doors. ...I would have done this...

majority would say pratigya is wrong in not supporting k on this. On the show they are implying that her decision is right... Does this mean that the majority are wrong in their judgement or will they later show pratigya regretting her decision. I want to know what message they want to send young girls and married women, with this track.

Originally posted by: ...Poojie...

U put up a very valid point here that I completely forgot about. Honestly I am still confused as to how did Prof was let off from his crime...He did let angad's hands off after remembering all the hard times Angad gave...so he did commit a murder...and how exactly does pratigya's kidnapping truth prove that prof was innocent?? 🤔..of course all these questions were forgotten as we had more important issues like krishna knowing the truth and his reactions...Looking back...she not only let off prof for the murder but also adarsh who infact committed the same crime as krishna...Eeven Adarsh was provoked by angad and he was out to attack him ..infact there was a fight as well...So when Pratigya can understand Adarsh's stance then why not Krishna's??...If a well educated and "cultured" guy full of principles can do this so can't she understand krishna's temperament??...I am not defending Krishna's actions at all...legally he was wrong...but can every situation be judged taken law into account??...