behaviours of krisna and pratigya

Originally posted by: soapbubble

Originally posted by: shy2729

My take on the situation is that K is a man who believes in Black and white, there are no grey zones for him. He would have surely understood P's predicament if P would have told him about it. Give me one instance when P has spoken about the uneasiness she feels in that house. In fact, there have been instances when she tried to brush off the daily dose of humiliations as minor irritants.

P is fully immersed in the Saxena's classic of ' Much ado about nothing'. She has totally stopped responding to the actual world, read TN, that she is living in. K has become a periphery charac. for her, her very own pet.Nice to shower love but not good enough for solving her woes.

I am not sure why the Cvs have presented P in this manner but this is surely exasperating! Is it because P had never invested too much of her emotions into this relationship. Was it just a BTW kind of experience for P.It is only when the stakes are high that we become more cautious.

In y'day's situation, how could have K defended P. It would have just re-emphasised his now well estd. status as JKG. Rt. now he is not too sure of P's level of commitment for him but what he is sure about is when compared to Sax family, he comes a distant second. K cannot exist in an emotional vacuum, so till the time, he is totally sure of what P feels for him at this juncture., he will hold on to his family. However evil it might be. K seems to be a simplistic man, he needs assurances from P that he is still loved by her.And he will need it again and again/ That is where that latent inferiority complex comes to play.."I am not good enough for her."

Originally posted by: dhakarn

just look at pratigya's behavior from krishna's point of view....................did she behave like a sanskaari bahu in the yesterday's episode...........no , not at all.................whatever the nature of her in-laws be it is her duty to go out of their house after asking their permission or even informing them................she didn't show slightest sanskaar and culture she is so busy upholding................ and amma pointed out all the right things about pratigya.............she never tried to be one of them, she was never a family member there.............krishna tries so hard to get the approval of sucksenas even though they insults him every time, but pratigya never tried to be among them, all she does is keep on disobeying them and their rules(this is what krishna will think)......................this is what every MIL and FIL will feel.............(lets forget amma and SS r faking) but to krishna's eyes this is the truth..............so no wonder he is getting angry.............and just look at the way she talked when she came back from her home..........as if nobody else exists in the world.............she just asked 'did u eat? ' as a mere formality and without waiting for an answer proceeded with her rantings..............if she has any concern for him she shouldn't have behaved like that..................this is exactly what is going on in his mind..............
she knows his nature, then why is she playing ignorant.................

Originally posted by: telstra

krishna

he loves pratigya he respects her nodoubt about it but he should be aware of the fact that its very difficult for a girl like pratigya to live at the place he call home.her father mother disrespects her wife not at home but infront of everyone even the maid they have never given her the love she should be getting as a DIL of the house.i dont want him to disrespect his father and mother but after soo much time and so much direct tauntings at him and his wife about food money job etc he seriously think about moving and living his own life for her wifes sake whom she loves more than anything. he should realise that pratigya is only living here because she loves him toooooooooo much and he gave her everything but unable to provide izzat ki roti.

Originally posted by: dhakarn

just look at pratigya's behavior from krishna's point of view....................did she behave like a sanskaari bahu in the yesterday's episode...........no , not at all.................whatever the nature of her in-laws be it is her duty to go out of their house after asking their permission or even informing them................she didn't show slightest sanskaar and culture she is so busy upholding................ and amma pointed out all the right things about pratigya.............she never tried to be one of them, she was never a family member there.............krishna tries so hard to get the approval of sucksenas even though they insults him every time, but pratigya never tried to be among them, all she does is keep on disobeying them and their rules(this is what krishna will think)......................this is what every MIL and FIL will feel.............(lets forget amma and SS r faking) but to krishna's eyes this is the truth..............so no wonder he is getting angry.............and just look at the way she talked when she came back from her home..........as if nobody else exists in the world.............she just asked 'did u eat? ' as a mere formality and without waiting for an answer proceeded with her rantings..............if she has any concern for him she shouldn't have behaved like that..................this is exactly what is going on in his mind..............
she knows his nature, then why is she playing ignorant.................

Originally posted by: soapbubble

Dhakarn,
Pratigya has never held herself up as a sanskaari bahu and CERTIANLY NOT one who wears her pallu over her head, eats after her husband has eaten and asking for permission beofre going out. And nor would modern audiences still want to see an archaic woman holding on to cultural mores from another century. oh, what i have written is from krishna's point of view............but tell me do this century bahus, educated or uneducated go out of their sasuraal without informing their in-laws especially in india..........if so then they maybe living in a virtual india!!!!!!!!! and no indian women however progressive she is would do such a thing unless she is a rotten character..........she infomed dadi when she had to got go the doc with kesar..there was some emergency in that situation.....where is any emergency situation here..is mamphodganj under the threat of extinction in those few minutes when she could have shown the least of the manners excepted from her as a righteous women............. What she does uphold is respect for human beings, women, common kindness, humane behaviour and common courtesy between human beings. Exactly she shows common courtesy according to her wish , it seems...........respecting elders and that too ur in-laws however mean they r is one such thing.........i am not telling her to ask them permission, no, tell them, inform them.....they r the masters of the house.........

If she is not appreciated in the Thakur Niwas, that is no surprise. They cannot bend her will, so they attack her. But what about the other VERY sanskari bahu, Kesar? We have all seen how she is treated, haven't we? that should tell us what Sanskaars the Thakurs uphold and with what grace they maintain those SANSKAARS. i never mentioned thakur's version of sanskaars, just bec they have a biased view of sanskaar doen't mean pratigya sholud forget it too...............and its not me the CVs have presented pratigya before us a sanskaari beti and bahu........did she ever leave her house without telling her 'papa'.....yes she has decided to keep her reason to go out a secret but has she ever done that.........no......and shyamji is going on and on about his daughter being a very 'sanskaari beti'............or did he meant sanskaars to be shown as and when one please........

And please, the word 'sanskaar' is a deep one - it stands for many sterling values which are still relevant. Let's not demean it by limiting it to hypociritical show of modesty.Anyone including Arushi can pull that off. Not everyone can be like Pratigya. would anybody in the world refrain from saying sorry to anybody they hurt just bec any dimwit or even cruel person can 'say' it..............do anybody refrain from doing what is required in a situation just bec a person less moral has done it.............i don't know then how the world is working!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Bubble