Precap - Wretched Wednesday !! - Page 10

Originally posted by: nisha2010

hello

hello

calling paul d octopus.................

Originally posted by: Dreamygal301

Tanthya,

Anyone that helps A get out of this jam will be a star. But I have high hopes about Kesar, I understand why she doesn't want to rock the boat...her first priority is to her unborn child as it should be. She owes life to that child so will not do anything that will jeopardise that.

Re: the Aarushi track relating to Kriya.....I think CVs think a lot of people, especially those in rural areas (no offence meant) take everything at face value. So they've developed a parallel track where something happens to A, not rape(I hope) but harassment with perhaps clothes torn or something.....Krish will see it's not her fault and therefore apply that logic to Prats kidnapping..😔 many put a lot of stock on outward actions, not on expressions and minute reactions, so they need something spelt out right in front of the audiences eyes so everyone will say 'ahhh so aarushi not at fault, so Prats not at fault'...

Correct me if I'm wrong...I never once heard Krishna blame Prats for the kidnapping.....so I don't understand why IF members are saying this is the case and that's why this track has been introduced.

I for one am not happy about this and I hope that there is no parallel track at all. The problems between Kriya is one created by their own inherent personalities and so therefore need to be resolved by them. Otherwise, we the viewers will feel cheated, we won't know what's truly in their heart.

If anything, I think it will be a push to Kriya to resolve their problems... how? that I don't know.

Originally posted by: Dyehard

What Krishna's real issues are can be debated till the cows come home, and I suspect we will all be right somewhat. So lets us see what he is saying at face value. He has used the words "Dhoka" "bewafaai" and tumra Angand and insinuated that he was married under false pretenses. Now we might think that he is sad because she did not trust him enough to involve him in her troubles, but that is not what he is saying.
He is saying that you were not pure as driven snow (despite her refuting this) and I had a right to know this before I married you. (for all the world as if she threw herself at him!) He is saying that he disbelieves her innocence in the whole Angad fiasco; it was way below the belt to call him Tumra Angad. It will be as shocking if someone said "tumra Shakti" to AArushi. It is very cruel to link the victim to the oppressor in this way. If anything Krishna ought to feel Prats's pain. Just because a woman thinks it is her duty to remain strong it does not mean that she will not need or be happy for some support.
I love Baba to death, in my heart I like to believe that he is only lashing out in anger and does not really mean what he says. But this does not take away from the fact that I think it is in very poor taste to use the lowest tactics in a fight. He is falling back on the very ordinary tricks and accusations of a very ordinary sort of man. It is not worthy of him. But since I am always willing for him to redeem himself ( this whole story is in fact about his Redemption) I have hope and patience for him.
And while like you say, the issues between Kriya are those of personality, we cannot forget that there are also great differences of values. Till these persist, there will always be conflict in the Kriya relationship.

Originally posted by: HamiSky

Exactly Tanth..

santharpam satchihaloda super-a explain pannitinga!!

Originally posted by: Dyehard

What Krishna's real issues are can be debated till the cows come home, and I suspect we will all be right somewhat. So lets us see what he is saying at face value. He has used the words "Dhoka" "bewafaai" and tumra Angand and insinuated that he was married under false pretenses. Now we might think that he is sad because she did not trust him enough to involve him in her troubles, but that is not what he is saying.
He is saying that you were not pure as driven snow (despite her refuting this) and I had a right to know this before I married you. (for all the world as if she threw herself at him!) He is saying that he disbelieves her innocence in the whole Angad fiasco; it was way below the belt to call him Tumra Angad. It will be as shocking if someone said "tumra Shakti" to AArushi. It is very cruel to link the victim to the oppressor in this way. If anything Krishna ought to feel Prats's pain. Just because a woman thinks it is her duty to remain strong it does not mean that she will not need or be happy for some support.
I love Baba to death, in my heart I like to believe that he is only lashing out in anger and does not really mean what he says. But this does not take away from the fact that I think it is in very
poor taste to use the lowest tactics in a fight. He is falling back on the very ordinary tricks and accusations of a very ordinary sort of man. It is not worthy of him. But since I am always willing for him to redeem himself ( this whole story is in fact about his Redemption) I have hope and patience for him.
And while like you say, the issues between Kriya are those of personality, we cannot forget that there are also great differences of </font> <font size="4" color="#9900cc">values</font><font color="#9900cc">. Till these persist, there will always be conflict in the Kriya relationship.</font>

Originally posted by: tanthya

Since the cows are refusing to come home , lets continue 😊 ...

As for as I am concerned, Krishna is not saying you are not pure as snow, but her intention were not pure as snow..and from his POV, he has enough circumstatntial evedence to think so..first Angad contacted him to teach a lesson to her..This usually happens when a lover is jilted by his love ...secondly when SS and Shakthi are dicussing ways of disposing Angad, Pratigya interposes and delivers a homily on the sanctity of life...she interferes when Angad talk is going on..to the Thakur's it will seem like , she is pleading for Angad...At the time, when she shud be hopping mad at Angad for causing grievous injury to Krishna, her sympathetic support to Angad will seem out of place and will give a cause for doubt ..despite asking repeatedly, she refuses to divulge her secrets...SHE has registered a complaint AGAINST Angad...why shud she do it if it were for Aarushi, Aarushi's father is capable of doing it...why then did she register her complaint in her name, possibly Angad was troubling her..and why was Angad troubling...could be there was a dalliance between them and he wants to rekindle it and Pratigya doesn't want to..finally the most damning of all..why did theProf agree to pay ?? if nothing happened or if nothing existed betwn Pratigya-Angad..what was the need to pay..and to compound this colossal mistake..why did Prof agree to meet him at the hilltop all alone and at the first opportunity kill him..what secrets did Angad hold, that it was urgent to conceal them ??

These will be the demons tearing at Krishna's belief...he loves her but cant reconcile his demons with his love ..until then he will punish himself by punishing her !!

Originally posted by: tanthya

In word Nisha,

He does not believe her intention !!..he is not bothered about her virginity status, he is bothered that she is not emotionally pure !!