dear members when I see krishna making pratigya realise that he is doing everything for her only , and expects something from her side in return and pratigya clears that "has I asked to do these things for me?" people call it her attitude......but I just want to share my own experience , it may match to that situation in some ways.
" I was just married , one day my mother-in-law gave me one necklace and said it's for you ..... as I was newly married , I thought that ,may be she will be giving it to me happily .....after somedays when we all were sitting and talking and enjoying ..... she talked a little bit of that necklace and it's price , I thought that she would be talking normally and just like that , but after some months she complained to my mother that she had brought a necklace for me and I had not paid it's money and further she added that she had also told me the price of that necklace.....my mother asked me that why I not paid money .....I told them that I had never asked them to bring a necklace for me , so why should I pay money for that " after that I always refuse to take anything from my mother - in - law so according to you who was wrong? me or my mother-in - law.....If my pocket doesn't allow then should I take those things which my mother-in-law brings for me at her own and wants me to accept and pay back it's money?I think in same way krishna does something for prati on his own and expects love , physical pleasures as a cost of his doings which prati pocket never allows.......what do you guys think ???? please comment and share your views.....