Aug 10 WU - Sagaai ki Scheme - Page 4

@sidra08
I wrote that Jagya going alone with Ganga was inappropriate, and I stand by it. Of course he is needed as a witness, but the Singh family were witnesses too. Basant or Bhairon, and Anandi or some social worker should have accompanied Ganga, even if Jagya goes as a witness. And in response to Ganga being different from Phooli and Gulli, her circumstances are different but in a logical world, the Singhs would have treated all three of them similarly. Realistically the Singhs would have sent Ganga to a mahila ashram in the very beginning.

And Lol at your comment on Lal Singh - applying your logic that Lal Singh needs to be with his wife on Teej, Jagya too needs to be with his family for the naming ceremony and his forthcoming engagement. Why should he personally get involved for each and every thing related to a woman whom he is helping out of humanitarian reasons?

I also stand by my statement that CVs have mangled the Ganga track. I am not against them showing Jagya with Ganga, but the way it has been shown - Singhs going overboard with their charity and letting a complete stranger into their home and then treating her like family, Sumitra getting estranged from her own family, Ganga getting infatuated with her benefactor before she is independent - all this is quite distasteful and has brought down BV to the level of an ordinary saas bahu soap.

I am not here to argue and I don't think I need to answer the personal remarks that you have made on me or the remarks that you have passed on my views.

You are entitled to your views, as I am to mine.

Originally posted by: SPuja

I can only say that only a few people are understanding the creatives and anyone criticizing the creatives for the bad tracks are ridiculed as not logical. Can someone explain whether the track where no body was injured after so much violence was logical? Can anybody explain whether a person who is going to be engaged say that he cannot be available on that date because he has to go with some other woman to drop her to her college (this was just speculation and the actual episode may show another thing)- can it be logical? Which two functions Bhairo and Basant are attending? What proof Jagya or Ganga gave to court that she got such a speedy divorce? Did not Rat question their (Jagya-Ganga) relationship in court? If not, why not, because creatives want to show speedy decision even if it is impossible in reality. The speedy education and speedy divorce are so unreal but if I say this, I will be ridiculed that I do not see the serial or I do not understand it.

only a few people like you are also criticizing cvs so much everything is bad track for you why don't you try to understand for once too and that my comment was not for you only i quoted two persons in one

Originally posted by: aa112233

@sidra08
I wrote that Jagya going alone with Ganga was inappropriate, and I stand by it.

keep standing by it only you know why it was inappropriate rest no one calls it Perhaps he alone saving her was inappropriate too Singhs should have been there as well Right? Which law , religion and theory calls Jagaya going alone with Ganga in court as inappropriate Kindly tell me ?

Of course he is needed as a witness, but the Singh family were witnesses too. Basant or Bhairon, and Anandi or some social worker should have accompanied Ganga, even if Jagya goes as a witness.

Basant and Bhairo and others if didn't go nothing happened They cannot go they have their reasons Anandi is busy with a case Police it self is eye witness of what happened in haveli they were not needed much there A social work God knows what he is suppose to do there ?🥱

And in response to Ganga being different from Phooli and Gulli, her circumstances are different but in a logical world, the Singhs would have treated all three of them similarly. Realistically the Singhs would have sent Ganga to a mahila ashram in the very beginning.

This is not for me but why they should have send her there? I guess you don't know but phooli and Gulli's relatives are alive yet not dead and taking good care of them so why they should have kept them in their house forever ? and Singhs are not same like before now they have learnt their many lessons Redeemed in many things Dadisaa is no longer same old Dadisaa and Ganga has no one in her family to take care of her why it is realistic they should have send her to mahila asharam ? if they kept her in house because they became fond of her then it became unrealistic? wow 😆

And Lol at your comment on Lal Singh - applying your logic that Lal Singh needs to be with his wife on Teej, Jagya too needs to be with his family for the naming ceremony and his forthcoming engagement. Why should he personally get involved for each and every thing related to a woman whom he is helping out of humanitarian reasons?

So whats crime in personally involving in a woman's matters whose responsibility he took ?why he should be sending others for it ? Its none of their business He got her admitted there he should go why others should go? Lol is for you Teej fast Lal Singh has to break of his wife while in naming ceremony and pooja Jagaya has to do nothing but sit and smile Pooja is completely for females and A relationship based on humanitarian grounds has humanity in it and a person do works personally there i would be doing if you won't be Why i should disturb others in a work i have chosen to do ?

I also stand by my statement that CVs have mangled the Ganga track. I am not against them showing Jagya with Ganga, but the way it has been shown - Singhs going overboard with their charity and letting a complete stranger into their home and then treating her like family, Sumitra getting estranged from her own family, Ganga getting infatuated with her benefactor before she is independent - all this is quite distasteful and has brought down BV to the level of an ordinary saas bahu soap.

You will love your benefactor too everyone does don't know whats illogical in it? She is not infatuated she loves him Don't you worship your God same she does of him she considers him equal to god for her

anyways disagree with everything you said Nothing is so mangled here Singhs getting overboard Lol perhaps you don't know they have always been like this guess you forgot Treating a stranger as your family member is a good work is it bad ? didn't know that? i treat my servant as my family member i am going overboard didn't know it ?Nothing is quite distasteful in it you are not against Jagaya Ganga Lol seem to me quite a lot otherwise you won't be calling a victim woman developing feelings for her benefactor as distasteful because its quite natural and she is not infatuated that Sanchi is I hope you know difference between infatuation and love ?

I am not here to argue and I don't think I need to answer the personal remarks that you have made on me or the remarks that you have passed on my views.

Telling truth means personal remarks Lol anyways it wasn't a personal remark but criticism of your post where i found errors

You are entitled to your views, as I am to mine.

keep them