is sapna says true about her dressing ??? - Page 3

Originally posted by: -Chandramukhi-

I don't understand why people are mixing various aspects of her speech.

1st she said she can't dance because she feels masculine or manly for the thumkas. Thus she even told Karishma not to take pressure whether they get selected or not. This was one of the reasons she didn't want to dance.

2nd she stated clearly that she doesn't agree with BB making all the girls dance for the cheap entertainment and she even included BW in it. I think the point she was trying to put across was the use of girls and skin show for the sake of public. And I completely agree with this point of hers. Nowadays, BW is focusing on such tactics to attract the audience.

3rd She also clarified that she isn't the type who can wear revealing clothes AND dance, doesn't mean others can't. Simply that she isn't that kind of "aurat". She was merely expressing her views against the skin show in dancing. I don't think she was being judgmental but simply emphasizing the difference between girls who are OK with such skin show and those who aren't. And anyone including Karishma, if not OK with doing so, could have backed out just like her.

4th Yes she messed up big time by generalizing not wearing revealing clothes at all in her real life. In the context I feel she meant not wearing such clothes and dancing for the sake of entertainment (yes she could have danced without embracing such clothes, but she was here generalizing BB dance to that of the inflation of item songs in BW). But end of the day she jumbled up her views and it turned into a mess.

And some also mentioned something about contract and how she should oblige with whatever is being assigned to her. Well, none of us know how their contracts are designed and no one is going to be dumb enough to oppose it and plant a seed to get sued in return. Such contracts aren't always black and white and it has to include individuals' boundaries and subjectivity on such activities. Also, there are multiple reasons why someone would choose BB. Models might have chosen to get exposure and try their hands at BW, while people like Sampat Pal and Sapna could have chosen to bring about awareness or put across their rebellious views on such platform. So I don't think people choose BB for ONLY entertaining the audience, there are layers of other reasoning involved as well.

Basically the gist I got from her argument is that she can't do the "thumkas" because of her manliness in her movements and that she was being the rebel against the way women are being used in the fashion/BW industry for the so called entertainment. And I think she was bang on to start opposing from BB itself who relies on such tactics as we have seen it multiple times in multiple BB season.

P.S: That was merely my interpretation of her argument.

Originally posted by: pesi11

at the start of bigboss show , she came on to the stage wearing a black dress that shows her thighs 😆 ...n when she was suppose to dance, she is saying she can't wear all these dresses ..blah blah... 😲

n she looks so modern and shows thoughts of hi5 and yet talks ill of others who dance wearing short dresses 😡 ... and again she clarifies that she is not saying against them wearing such clothes and she just saying that she can't as if the other ppl gonna blast on her for wat she says ...she is double minded ..no no..multi-minded 😆


some one plz throw this stupid lady out of house 😊

Pesi Ji...Cruiser's Cruising take on Pyaari Sapna:

https://www.indiaforums.com/forum/bigg-boss-season-6-alag-che/3234016/dapper-dasher-dharamveer-in-bb-6

Originally posted by: Khushi.

Chandu ,

👍🏼- For your post. But still , 👎🏼- For Sapna " I am a Krantikari" Bhavnani.

You know Khushi I wouldn't go that far to address her as the "Krantikari" She is no where near there. She is more or less a Rebel or a brat who follows her own set of rules without giving a hoot about others.

I do not agree with her hypocrite statements and it tarnished whatever message she wanted to put across to the audience. And I do not care what she has done or the kinda person she is, what mattered to me was that someone at least raised a question towards the general trend of BW on a national TV without caring of what the industry would think of her when the same industry is responsible for her claim to fame. I applaud her for raising a valid point but definitely do not agree with hypocrisy.

Originally posted by: vibhusharma78

She said she can't wear deep neck dresses, or dresses which expose her. She was wearing knee long dress, which was ok, even school going girls wear knee long skirts... which doesn't' mean exposure.

Originally posted by: -Chandramukhi-

You know Khushi I wouldn't go that far to address her as the "Krantikari" She is no where near there. She is more or less a Rebel or a brat who follows her own set of rules without giving a hoot about others.

I do not agree with her hypocrite statements and it tarnished whatever message she wanted to put across to the audience. And I do not care what she has done or the kinda person she is, what mattered to me was that someone at least raised a question towards the general trend of BW on a national TV without caring of what the industry would think of her when the same industry is responsible for her claim to fame. I applaud her for raising a valid point but definitely do not agree with hypocrisy.

Originally posted by: Khushi.

She called herself a Krantikari , so I will also refer her to the same..LOL..and yes, @ Bold- You are absolutely right.

And for the rest , well the whole scene never came up to me as " she raising the point you mentioned" so i won't applaud her for any such thing. But your Interpretation of her statement is of what I totally agree.

Yes you can call her "Krantikaari" Bhavnani. Sounds quite peppy. I do not mind it at all 😛

I just meant she can't be called a Krantikaari and she has that big misconception about herself unless I find something relevant where she made a big different to the society.

@bold: It's weird and confusing that you didn't get to see that point being raised. I guess I am puzzled but oh well, enough of this discussion. As usual we agree to disagree 😃

OMG khushi you are here as well🤗

hi welcome to this forum pls visit...

I am sorry, this is not to offend anyone... but from what I understood, probably her sexual orientation is not feminine and thats why she doesn't want to wear dresses or dance...she siad, she was masculine/manly etc... so thats what I understood..(and nothing wrong in that... it is her choice)... I could be wrong about what I understood though...