If it was approached from a different perspective?

Originally posted by: boyuancy

Now, how many of you remember the episode in which a guy bullies 4 kids - a nerd, an overweight girl, a cricketer, and a policeman's son? The episode was approached from the victim's (the 4 kids) perspective. And in the end, we probably didn't end up feeling as sorry as we should have for the bully's death.

Now, come back to Tushar's case. In all honesty, Tushar was the actual victim here. And for the most part (even after he does, what he does) he remains the victim - I mean, think about it: a brilliant student who has stood first since 1st standard, an extremely talented techie, and for the most part, a very good guy. He gets thrown behind bars.

But in this episode, the three girls are victimized instead of Tushar. I know that the girls could have gotten into some serious trouble, but still...

Now my question is:

Would your perspective on this have been different if it were approached from a different perspective (Tushar's)?

😕

Originally posted by: shibz

He was a brilliant student..he could've utilized his skills in a productive way..but from what he did it seemed..he had a terrorist's mind-they have their own reasons for being that..they waste their brains and life terrorizing ppl for they cant live the life others are living or they cant see others living peacefully.. What Tushar did was not a small school boy revenge.. He was being cunning.. like what they say a wolf in disguise.. Even a hacker is actually a brilliant techie.. So can his actions be justified coz he was brilliant and had a bright future..when he himself couldn't see that but chose to walk on the path of crime? Every criminal has a reason...so do we sympathize with the criminals?