Indira killed by her inlaws?

jjkg thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#1
Here we have a hatke show.


So instead of Indira being killed for money by her inlaws, we have Rishi being tortured by goons hired by some Sharma and they have killed him (well we hope they haven't, but they have done their part).

Imagine if Indira had been subjected to such rough treatment as a bahu.
  • How much anguish would we have experienced?

  • Would we have tolerated Rishi being blind to his family's abusive, extreme parasitic behavior?

  • How many chappals we would have thrown at Rishi for being so blind to his family's abuse of him as well as his wife? How many gaalis we would have given him?

  • Would we have rejoiced in his pain or tolerated/excused it?
No!

No one would have tolerated such blind slavish devotion to abuse. What is the utmost that anyone can do to the other? - Take their life. That is the ultimate sin

We have Sharmas who have done precisely that. They have succeeded in torturing him, killing him, and eliminating any threat he posed to their idle existence filled with their selfish wants that Indira is supposed to work her bones off to fulfill. Even the kidnappers remarked at how disgusting the family is ..something about chewing her bones off


Only today in Rati's AT there was excellent discussion on male abuse of his partner and how no woman would have tolerated it.

So question is what is in our psyche that makes us tolerate or rejoice in Indira's pain and blindness to the darkness in her family, the threat they have posed to her own being? We all have been guilty of this. Proof is that while there have been numerous threads today on Rishi dying, but no one has expressed anger at Sharmas killing him.

Now if Indira had been killed by the Diwans, we would have had numerous threads abusing them, wishing them to hell and whatnot.


So why?

Is it because if she had been an abused, battered wife being killed by her in-laws and her husband was a spineless, blind slave to them, we would have been able to relate to it more because this is tragically what many, many women face daily in their lives. Almost all of us in our lifetime will know a case or more of such a woman, a woman whom we knew personally.

Is it also because inspite women's lib and all that, we expect man to be a man, i.e. aggressive, ego driven or at least a healthy respect for his ego to not take BS from any one.

Rishi lost all his ego through guilt he suffers because of Vidith's accident, as well as intense desperate need for Indira's love...and maybe desire to protect her.
Hence though we are upset at his death, the connection between his state and Sharmas has not reached a visceral level where it would spawn anger



Any comments on why we haven't seen an explosion of anger would be much appreciated.

Created

Last reply

Replies

5

Views

1k

Users

4

Likes

17

Frequent Posters

ALUJNA21 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 9
Posted: 13 years ago
#2
you are right this is not a saas bahu dramas but still the lead actress is in pain and it is a sasural-damad dramas the contrary of saas bahu.
As you can see despite being so rich Rishi shifted for lifetime in SN and continuously with a smile is suffering from their atyachaar.
If he's returning as Ricky diwan his true identity better it is soon than late because the show status is it is falling.
Edited by KajAnj - 13 years ago
orianthi thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#3

Originally posted by: KajAnj

you are right this is not a saas bahu dramas but still the lead actress is in pain and it is a sasural-damad dramas the contrary of saas bahu.

As you can see despite being so rich Rishi shifted for lifetime in SN and continuously with a smile is suffering from their atyachaar.
If he's returning as Ricky diwan his true identity better it is soon than late because the show status is it is falling.


sasural-damad drama is right!
jjkg thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#4

Originally posted by: orianthi


sasural-damad drama is right!



Agree - yeh sasural -damad drama hai


But the question still is why are we tolerating the behavior meted out by Sharmas, and now killing of Rishi by them? why are we delighting or passively tolerating Indira's pain, blind acceptance of whatever her family dishes out?

Would we accept the behavior from a man what we are accepting of a woman?

Is this not inherently unfair? If men and women are equal then what is bad for the man should also be bad for the woman.

Ofcourse Indira is as much a victim of her family as Rishi is, though now scales may be in Rishi's favor as he has been killed or almost killed.

But Indira has been accepting and enabling her family's bad behavior. If she had given some pushback earlier things may not have come to this pass.


But the question is not of Indira, but ourselves.

Why do we feel her pain but not rishi's? If tables were turned, would we have felt Rishi's pain and ignored Indira's...or...given Rishi the leeway we are giving Indira?
ALUJNA21 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 9
Posted: 13 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: jjkg



Agree - yeh sasural -damad drama hai


But the question still is why are we tolerating the behavior meted out by Sharmas, and now killing of Rishi by them? why are we delighting or passively tolerating Indira's pain, blind acceptance of whatever her family dishes out?

Would we accept the behavior from a man what we are accepting of a woman?

Is this not inherently unfair? If men and women are equal then what is bad for the man should also be bad for the woman.

Ofcourse Indira is as much a victim of her family as Rishi is, though now scales may be in Rishi's favor as he has been killed or almost killed.

But Indira has been accepting and enabling her family's bad behavior. If she had given some pushback earlier things may not have come to this pass.


But the question is not of Indira, but ourselves.

Why do we feel her pain but not rishi's? If tables were turned, would we have felt Rishi's pain and ignored Indira's...or...given Rishi the leeway we are giving Indira?

Oh I'm happy to give it a new title.Sasural-Damad drama.
No!!! may be we'll have taken it more seriously because Indira being a woman is suffering in her in laws.
But here as Rishi is a man we were not expecting that one of the Sharmas will go to the extent of killing him.
Today also being a woman is always considered to be a little more delicate than a man which is also true.
ramyadeepika5 thumbnail
Posted: 13 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: jjkg



Agree - yeh sasural -damad drama hai


But the question still is why are we tolerating the behavior meted out by Sharmas, and now killing of Rishi by them? why are we delighting or passively tolerating Indira's pain, blind acceptance of whatever her family dishes out?

Would we accept the behavior from a man what we are accepting of a woman?

Is this not inherently unfair? If men and women are equal then what is bad for the man should also be bad for the woman.

Ofcourse Indira is as much a victim of her family as Rishi is, though now scales may be in Rishi's favor as he has been killed or almost killed.

But Indira has been accepting and enabling her family's bad behavior. If she had given some pushback earlier things may not have come to this pass.


But the question is not of Indira, but ourselves.

Why do we feel her pain but not rishi's? If tables were turned, would we have felt Rishi's pain and ignored Indira's...or...given Rishi the leeway we are giving Indira?

u r absolutely right

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".