jagya oversmart.. forgets logic!!

Originally posted by: harithanhp

with jagya blackmailing the entire haveli clan, how could he forget that he has married gauri without taking divorce so if a case is filed against them for infidelity he ll b on roads.. with not even the gauri whom he s been clinging to ... what s wrong with bhairon?? how did he miss this point?? he could ve simply told jagya.. "apne girebaan me jhaank" if anandi really files a case for jagya's second marraige what will he be left with?? bhairon could have easily convinced dadisa and shooed both jagya and gauri away to curse off in mumbai!! atleast they wudn be happy with confidence wid stuff like "meri jeet hui sasum" <bullshit> and on top he neway doesnot ve money to go for a court case to ask back his "share". with this he could have just shut his mouth. i'm somehow more of jagya's anti.. so what if gauri fills his ears.. has he no brains of his own???

i so wished bhairon would scare the hell out of jagya by counterblackmailing him!! <sigh> but neway such things don happen since ppl always need to be scared of the vamps and underover of a fake "majboori" need to succumb to stuff missing all reasoning, counters and logic!! <sigh again>

Originally posted by: payalibm

i agre wht u saying is true...but acording to indian law of property...son wether good or bad maryin ilgal or not,or have left her wife and stying with other woman has no signifcne when he ask for shar in property,he have full equal right on property ..if tht property is not self made...means if it has been in family for generation,,then jagyat has full right to have share on tht propert..if this property and money has been made by bhairo himself then only bhairo can kick him out form this property...and its up to bhairo as he wishes to dispose it..thtn too jagat can file case and ask 4 share..ther he wudnt get as its self made money and property and d owner has full right to disppose has his desire..but not here,yes basant tau saa and bapu sa work but propert has been in family for generation...so bahiro or basant or dadisa no one cant do anything when jagat ask for share even f they put him in jail..he will ask and they have to give...the law is this way in india.so wht atm writer is doin in my openion is right...i think the writer must be also thinkin of askin bahiro to do wht evry one is asking...but they are showing the relaity and i think he rmbrs law too and writeing the story in lue with knowledge of law and evrything...its atm v. much a reality show...so much of it is truth here..so much..atm m simply in love wiht this serial..simply love it..its showing the world whts their behind the sceane..ppl are their like this..like jagayaa and their r still family who gave importance to their bahu and not their nalayak son..agreee this type of family v.less yet it exists...

Originally posted by: niharika_n

Jagya can only claim on ancestral property...ancentral property should be in the family for 4 genaration only then it can be termed ancentral...in this case everything is earned by dadisa and bhairov as dadisa had left her husband's home with nothing.

So he cant even claim tht...dadisa can easily disown him...