wait, a minute...

The thing that makes me laugh is that...have everyone forgotten that Naina is actually rich? I'm not saying that she's materialistic...but seeing as she grew up in a good scenery, big house..and with money to spare (if it is her inheritance), doesn't that mean that she's got more money than the patwardhans? Then, why does Rohini say that Naina is trying to take over the house for herself...when actually naina has the money to buy even bigger houses? Also, remember that scene when Rohini accused Naina of stealing her phone? What was that about? Plus, the way Rohini goes about it...seems like she's got everything, when she hasn't and is using the situation to her advantage...whilst Naina has the money...etc etc but being herself and the character she is...she's not at all materialistic?

haha, I agree with both of you! The way they go on about that Naina is an illegitimate child...omg, even aai stood up for her when meenu and abhi were against her...now what happened?! haha, yes! I think Naina has forgotten that she is rich...it'd be really awesome if she buys the patwardhans house right?

i agree with you all... i don't know whats the problem of CVs with Dakshna.. what is the problem in revealing Naina is such a rich girl.. too much irritating...!!! they do not reveal anything abt Dakshna.. 😡 never ever.. !!!

LOL, cv's have lost their mind