PRATIGYA 17th August Written Update - Page 6

Originally posted by: tanthya

Edited by PRAGMATIC - 13 years ago

Originally posted by: Bharat_

Tanthya,

I was away for a week. I had very very little internet access there.

I missed you and your lovely updates.

Originally posted by: PRAGMATIC

Prags , If U had read the WU ..i had clearly said that I HAD NO ISSUES WITH THE WORDS but with the tone !!

As for interfering , She can interfere till Kingdom come ..but there is such a thing called "APPROACH" ..and her approach was not right ...


Ashamed ..there is nothing to be ashamed about when u see it from the Thakur's POV..rather it is something that is expected and accepted ...This is clearly evident from the way Komal, Amma, GD reacted ... It is the educated one's , the common ppl who perceive this as crime...I suggest that u check up on the cultural milieu of the UP hinterland and of Thakur's to understand their ways... what u r purporting is that a metro man or city bred man's views and they have no place in the cut throat world of Thakur's ...believe some of them have not come out of the medievel mindset ...




Picking the scenes out of context..had u watched the scene ..u would know that the scene I quoted is the aftermath of Krishna's walkout and in context with what I was saying ..Hubby has walked out in anger and has stayed out the whole night and there is no hint of worry in her demeanor ...


what u said was out of context since u r referring to y'days scene while I was referring to older one , which was understood by the Original poster !!

Originally posted by: tanthya

Edited by PRAGMATIC - 13 years ago

Originally posted by: PRAGMATIC

Prags , If U had read the WU ..i had clearly said that I HAD NO ISSUES WITH THE WORDS but with the tone !!

Tanths dont get me worng 😆 The tone was appropriate, AMMA was making it even more difficult for K in that situation. His expressions if you had written a few more words could reflect his immediate remorse for that girl. Since he has a golden heart and not a criminal by nature, he is the victim of his habitat - The rural Thakur habitat. And he is not even talking talking to her mother as he knows how she played with his life. And his piercing glances tells a lot, targeting his mother which couldn't have escaped you escaped you either thaths. So her tone not only saved the day for Krish but stopped that devilish amma who wanted to treated a young girl, like dirt by asking her to lick the carpet for quenching her thurst sending Krishna into a deep spiraling though - Remorse and guilt was evident from his deamenour lator on whe he finally allowed his babu to speak her mind. A step that will help him make a correct decision all beacsue of this "TONE". 😆


Prags, that tone was appropriate if she were talking to soeone her junior but she was talking to someone her senior and that was out of sync ...His emotions were in agreement with Pratigya but that does not mean that she can start in front of a stranger... What shud b the case is her ordering Piyasiya to get the food , and when piyasiya hesitates to scold her and order more firmly ...

Krishna or Amma would never dare to open their mouth , since K knows P is right and Amma will not open her mouth as long as K stands supporting P ...and then follow Amma out and give a piece of her mind ...One does not give it back to an elder in front of a stranger ...


The guilt and whatever was evident yes bec she used the same tone on her hubby too and quite correctly !! . and she is at full liberty to use it on her hubby,Aarushi, Shakthi, Kesar, Adarsh,Komal but the line gets drawn when it comes to Elders ...! we don't berate our elders [howsoever wrong they are] in front of strangers , we go and talk it out in the privacy of the room ..


As for interfering , She can interfere till Kingdom come ut there is such a thing called "APPROACH" ..and her approach was not right ...

Same answer as above



Ashamed ..there is nothing to be ashamed about when u see it from the Thakur's POV..rather it is something that is expected and accepted ...This is clearly evident from the way Komal, Amma, GD reacted ... It is the educated one's , the common ppl who perceoive this as crime...I suggest that u check up on the cultural milieu of the UP hinterland and of Thakur's to understand their ways... what u r purporting is that a metro man or city bred man's views and they have no place in the cut throat world of Thakur's ...believe some of them have not come out of the medievel mindset ...

His demeanor changed noticeably right after this Sunehri incident, From towering rage to and ashamed and remorseful man who is biging to see the consequences of his actions. And I am not linking this fiction to any society urban, rural or metro but just trying to stay within the context and layout created by the creatives of this show. Otherwise Prats wouldn't have lived this far if this was a real world scenario.😆


Agree Pratigya would have been a dead meat long ago in real world !! ..No, not remorseful..He is not remorseful yet..his demeanor is that of an implacable will..A coldness ..He has not begun to see the consequences yet..he still believes that she is a bargaining chip..


Picking the scenes out of context..had u watched the scene ..u would know that the scene I quoted is the aftermath of Krishna's walkout and in context with what I was saying os..Hubby has walked out in anger and has stayed out the whole night and there is no hint of worry in her demeanor ...


what u said was out of context since u r referring to y'days scene while I was referring to older one , which was understood by the Original poster !!

Originally posted by: tanthya

Originally posted by: PRAGMATIC

Originally posted by: PRAGMATIC

Originally posted by: tanthya