I have limited time to make them all, but the first one I want to make is this.
Gauri's obsession with 'legality/kanoonan' is because in her own mind she is under the impression that the first marriage to jagya was voided by a mahapanchayat on grounds of samajik and dharmik (social and religious grounds) -- so somewhere along the way she believed that if she had the backing of the kanoon at that time, then this marriage would have stuck and not come unglued.
So, this time the second marriage she made sure she was kanoonan patni and the legal aspect was handled so that no mahapanchayat could annul it again.
The thing she doesnt know is that the first time around also the kanoon would not have supported her.
The law while holding all child marriages are illegal - makes a distinction between child marriage which is 'genuine' in the sense that parents real intention is to get the child married-- documented through assets given to the girl by her parents as dahej
vs.
child marriage which is 'selling the girl' -- documented by parents who sell the girl in exchange for money -- and do not provide any assets to the girl at all (in terms of any saris, clothes, jewellery etc.)
While the first type of marriage is anyway illegal - and the male parent faces two years imprisonment and 2 lakhs fine (mother of the girl or boy will not be imprisoned - only the father/uncle of the girl and the boy who arranges the marriage)
the second type of marriage falls under yet another law - child prostitution act/sex trafficing act.
Parents of girl who sell a minor girl in exchange for money from the groom are prosecuted as pimps for prostituting their daughter. The crime is more serious and leads to additional years of imprisonment and more penalty to be decided upon by the judge.
So gauri would not have had the support of the kanoon even at that time (which she believes is the only reason her marriage to jagya as a child did not stick - and which is why she waves the certificate to the villagers saying - I dont care for your samajik norms, I have legal support this time).
Gauri who gives no responsibility to her parents for selling her, and only blames dadisa for paying money to her parents saying "us dokri ney hamare garibi ka faayda uthaya" would be well advised to see what the law says about her own parents.
More later...