Same sex attraction. Should it be stopped? - Page 42

Created

Last reply

Replies

415

Views

32k

Users

34

Likes

399

Frequent Posters

-Aarya- thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago

Originally posted by: zorrro

Which government are you talking about? And which under-developed countries? If treatment is this expensive prevention should be more stringent



To me, the subject of AID prevention vs treatment is a circular debate. Some people say we need to shift away from treatment in favor of prevention. While some say that because treatment will only reach a fraction of those who need it, while preventing new infections should be the central tenet of any long term response to AIDs. As Albert Einstein said, the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again but expecting different results. You can de-emphasizing AIDS treatment, as if it is somehow an alternative to prevention, may not be insane, but re-hashing this old canard won't get us too far. To me treatment is prevention!

Edited by night13 - 14 years ago
_Angie_ thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago

^^ Aarya, once the person is already infected what do you expect to prevent!Death? For how long and what about the quality of life! Imagine a scenario where we choose to go for only treatment and no preventive measures. It will be a never ending task as new cases will keep emerging in the absence of any prevention. On the other hand imagine a different scenario where we focus only on prevention and no treatment. At worst the afflicted patients will all die but no more new cases of AIDS assuming we had a very effective preventive programme in place. Ideally we should go for a multi pronged attack to control the spread by creating awareness of the disease amongst the public, promotion of safe practices, easy accessibility to facilities for detection in early stage, treatment of confirmed cases with drugs at an affordable rate.

I don't see the Albert Einstein's quote fitting in here. Infact doing the preventive measure over and over might just be able to succeed in controlling the disease !

-Aarya- thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago

Originally posted by: angie.4u

^^ Aarya, once the person is already infected what do you expect to prevent!Death? For how long and what about the quality of life! Imagine a scenario where we choose to go for only treatment and no preventive measures. It will be a never ending task as new cases will keep emerging in the absence of any prevention. On the other hand imagine a different scenario where we focus only on prevention and no treatment. At worst the afflicted patients will all die but no more new cases of AIDS assuming we had a very effective preventive programme in place. Ideally we should go for a multi pronged attack to control the spread by creating awareness of the disease amongst the public, promotion of safe practices, easy accessibility to facilities for detection in early stage, treatment of confirmed cases with drugs at an affordable rate.

I don't see the Albert Einstein's quote fitting in here. Infact doing the preventive measure over and over might just be able to succeed in controlling the disease !



I agree that prevention and treatment go hand-in-hand, though my original question was on the cost of the treatment. Due to the lack of treatment (access to ARVs) in Africa the epidemic is wide spread. The availability of treatment encourages testing and knowing one's HIV status, the treatment is effective in halting the advancement of symptoms, and Treatment of those who tested positive can decreasing their risk of passing the virus on. Thus the treatment cost is too large for the poor populated country.



Edited by night13 - 14 years ago
_Angie_ thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago

Originally posted by: night13



I agree that prevention and treatment go hand-in-hand, though my original question was on the cost of the treatment. Due to the lack of treatment (access to ARVs) in Africa the epidemic is wide spread. The availability of treatment encourages testing and knowing one's HIV status, the treatment is effective in halting the advancement of symptoms, and Treatment of those who tested positive can decreasing their risk of passing the virus on. Thus the treatment cost is too large for the poor populated country.

True! Lack of treatment would make people hesitant to get themselves checked and that could be a big drawback. But there is hope as India exports drugs to nearly 200 countries providing treatment to nearly 86% of the world's AIDS patients at a very low cost. Infact this week itself Michel Sidibe, Executive Director, UNAIDS, has acknowledged India's leadership as being critical to achieve the goal of "zero new infections, zero discrimination and zero deaths due to AIDS" to which the world leaders committed at the UN meet held in June.

Summer3 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 14 years ago
This article on Aids in India is very informative.
https://www.avert.org/aidsindia.htm
Quote:
India is one of the largest and most populated countries in the world, with over one billion inhabitants. Of this number, it's estimated that around 2.4 million people are currently living with HIV.1
HIV emerged later in India than it did in many other countries. Infection rates soared throughout the 1990s, and today the epidemic affects all sectors of Indian society, not just the groups – such as sex workers and truck drivers – with which it was originally associated.
In a country where poverty, illiteracy and poor health are rife, the spread of HIV presents a daunting challenge.

People living with HIV in India come from incredibly diverse cultures and backgrounds. The vast majority of infections occur through heterosexual sex (80%), and is concentrated among high risk groups including sex workers, men who have sex with men, and injecting drug users as well as truck drivers and migrant workers. See our page on affected groups in India for more information.


TREATMENT

Antiretroviral drugs (ARVs), which can significantly delay the progression from HIV to AIDS – have been available in developed countries since 1996. Unfortunately, as in many resource-poor areas, access to this treatment is limited in India; an estimated 285,000 people were receiving free ARVs in 2009.69 This, totalled with the number receiving ARVs through the private sector, amounted to 320,000 people receiving ARVs in 2009. According to NACO, this represents just over half of the adults estimated to be in need of antiretroviral treatment in India. However, according to WHO's latest treatment guidelines (2010), which recommend starting treatment earlier, revised estimates may indicate that only around 1 in 4 people in need of HIV treatment are currently receiving it.70

While the coverage of treatment remains unacceptably low, improvements are being made. The government has started to expand access to ARVs in a number of areas; by November 2009 there were 266 reported sites providing antiretroviral therapy.71

Increasing access to ARVs also means that an increasing number of people living with HIV in India are developing drug resistance. When HIV becomes resistant to the ARVs the treatment regimen needs to be changed to 'second-line' ARVs. As with many other parts of the world, second-line treatment in India is far more expensive than first-line treatment.

In 2008, NACO began to roll out government funded second-line antiretroviral treatment in two centres in Mumbai and Chennai. However coverage remains limited; of the 3,000 who needed to be on second line treatment, about 970 were receiving it as of January 2010.72 73 One reason for this is expense; second line ARV drugs, unlike first line ARVs, are not produced on a large scale in India due to patent issues that control drug pricing. Therefore, they can be 10 times more expensive than first line ARVs.

Ironically, India is a major provider of cheap generic copies of ARVs to countries all over the world. However, the large scale of India's epidemic, the diversity of its spread, and the country's lack of finances and resources continue to present barriers to India's antitretroviral treatment programme. The Indian government has also been criticised for not providing palliative care for HIV patients.74

To read about the challenges faced in increasing access to antiretroviral drugs around the world, see our Universal access to AIDS treatment page.

(Above is only an extract, study gives the full history and present status by regions)


Summer3 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 14 years ago
In 2006 UNAIDS estimated that there were 5.6 million people living with HIV in India, which indicated that there were more people with HIV in India than in any other country in the world.19 In 2007, following the first survey of HIV among the general population, UNAIDS and NACO agreed on a new estimate – between 2 million and 3.1 million people living with HIV.20 In 2008 the figure was estimated to be 2.31 million.21 In 2009 it was estimated that 2.4 million people were living with HIV in India, which equates to a prevalence of 0.3%.22 While this may seem low, because India's population is so large, it is third in the world in terms of greatest number of people living with HIV. With a population of around a billion, a mere 0.1% increase in HIV prevalence would increase the estimated number of people living with HIV by over half a million.

back to top
The HIV/AIDS situation in different states

Map of India showing the worst affected states.
The vast size of India makes it difficult to examine the effects of HIV on the country as a whole. The majority of states within India have a higher population than most African countries, so a more detailed picture of the crisis can be gained by looking at each state individually.


The worst affected areas in India

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".