A Few words. - Page 3

Originally posted by: mia12

👏👏...I want to see consistency Pratz, when it comes to wrongful doing. She forgave her father, then her sister. This is her husband she should stand by her man in public...behind close door give him the third degree.

Yemi summed it up perfectly, Blood is thicker than water... and Prats proved it today.

Originally posted by: elle45

Right, I'd forgotten how she'd forgiven Adarsh and Arushi. She completely ignored the fact that Adarsh went there with hockey sticks (I think 😕) with the intention of beating Angad black and blue. If she thought Adarsh was provoked into it, then so was Krishna provoked.

Arushi didn't commit a crime, you see... she made an "innocent mistake" (bhool ho gayi)... and there is no punishment for a mistake (Yet I wonder when someone makes innocent mistakes in school, why do their marks get cut? 😆)

Just like you, I am also not defending Krishna, what he did was wrong. I am also not against Pratigya's decision to not help him... but I am against Prat's decision if I consider her previous decisions.

Exactly my sentiments..

Yes Adarsh went with hockey sticks and if I remember correctly then cycle chains as well...he has full intention to hurt Angad...
Arushi case is the biggest joke of the century!! ...no matter what the cvs, actors or pratigya supporters say..there is no justification to saying that arushi committed a "mistake" 👎🏼...they have severely erred but have forgiven them...
What would have happened if it was the case when K when after radhe to avenge his wife's humiliation...when radhe misbehaved with her...suppose P didn't follow K and K only took hockey sticks..and beat Radhe...and Radhe complained...Although yes Krishna is legally wrong in hitting Radhe...but would you refuse to bail your husband off saying he committed a crime??...

Pratigya needs to look into account what exactly happened rather than coming to the conclusion that K hit Radhe...so he should be jailed...

hmm i said it earlier this situation is quite confusing one cant say that whose right or rong but let me write my thoughts

Originally posted by: ...Poojie...

Exactly my sentiments..

Yes Adarsh went with hockey sticks and if I remember correctly then cycle chains as well...he has full intention to hurt Angad...
Arushi case is the biggest joke of the century!! ...no matter what the cvs, actors or pratigya supporters say..there is no justification to saying that arushi committed a "mistake" 👎🏼...they have severely erred but have forgiven them...
What would have happened if it was the case when K when after radhe to avenge his wife's humiliation...when radhe misbehaved with her...suppose P didn't follow K and K only took hockey sticks..and beat Radhe...and Radhe complained...Although yes Krishna is legally wrong in hitting Radhe...but would you refuse to bail your husband off saying he committed a crime??...

Pratigya needs to look into account what exactly happened rather than coming to the conclusion that K hit Radhe...so he should be jailed...

I honestly don't know what I would have done in the same situation. But I think if my hubby had beaten up an innocent man, perhaps I would let him be in jail for a few days... Maybe
But if I knew that he was completely provoked into it, by the man himself, then I would get his bail done.

If I was an Extremely law abiding citizen (which I am btw 😆) then I might have just gotten Radhe arrested when he ruined my business with a cockroach.

I am also puzzled about Amma's reaction, Why did she not consider her daughter's troubles yet went to Krishna within a few minutes? Differentiating between her kids? Or is it a case of sons are dearer than daughters? Komal has every right to be angry at her mother, everyone deserted her when she needed them. Only SS won't, I'm sure of that.

One question Poojie... Are you the same as SaacheeSyna? 😊

Originally posted by: elle45

I honestly don't know what I would have done in the same situation. But I think if my hubby had beaten up an innocent man, perhaps I would let him be in jail for a few days... Maybe
But if I knew that he was completely provoked into it, by the man himself, then I would get his bail done.

If I was an Extremely law abiding citizen (which I am btw 😆) then I might have just gotten Radhe arrested when he ruined my business with a cockroach.

I am also puzzled about Amma's reaction, Why did she not consider her daughter's troubles yet went to Krishna within a few minutes? Differentiating between her kids? Or is it a case of sons are dearer than daughters? Komal has every right to be angry at her mother, everyone deserted her when she needed them. Only SS won't, I'm sure of that.

One question Poojie... Are you the same as SaacheeSyna? 😊

Originally posted by: carisma2

Thanks Anu,

I agree with your legal input.. Provocation in defense is in the case of murder or manslaughter. Howeven there was a semi english film called provoked in which Ash kills her her hubby accidently possible, because she was provoked by his bad behaviour towards her.. She got off because she was 'provoked'. But yes that doesn't work in all cases.

Krish's act was provoked.. and in the interim he did have time to re-think. Now when Pratigya gave him the idea of getting his business back up.. he's already comminted the deed.. so it was a bit late. Though she did talk to him before- but he hadn't had a chance to clear his mind and all her advise was wasted.

This is a sticky situation.. where Raadhe is a character that just doesn't learn... It will be interesting to see that how the cv's will deal with his character.

I would also like to see, Pratigya's input on how to deal with Raade.. she has shown him a way forward with the business.. but now it remains to be seen how she expects to deal with Raade.

My only concern is that in the past.. Pratigya has been unable to punish the wrong doers effectively.

She tried - But they beat the system.

In her own way she is right... At the moment the cv's are showing that Pratigya is stuck between her principles and Patni Daram. Coz as far as I think Patni Daram goes - you have to support your husband no matter what... as far as I think.

Sory Carisma, patni Daram is not tht... Patni Daram is if ur husband is right, u hv to show ur support or fight for him... if he is doing something wrong u should not encourage him and make him dig his own hole or put himself in serious problem again... its like we behave with children... if they do some wrong, we should not pamper them and make him feel tht thts nothing... instead thru some punishments and then a small talk would help them not to do the same thing again... if they continue to do so... thn its their fate...
Komal supporting her husband, is not be taken a big deal... yest she was making fool of herself in the thana...[only acc to me] she is stating the fact tht all are taking bribes so why not him...in tht stance... but tht is not Patni Daram... at all acc to me atleast... wives should be there for him in his worst times, i agree but here K was shown to feel a little for P and what he has done to her... he was so cool sitting in the Police station... here Poor wife crying her heart out and hearing all those bad talks of ppl around... even his own bro telling him he is like dog's tail...

All Law abiding Mens are no Man ????? ... P is not taking away his manhood... Instead she is trying to make him a respectable man in the society... If its not for her... he would hv sitting there in the Haveli , eating with his father's money and chatting with friends here and there and occasionally getting accusations... Now he can be a real man, who is hard working, making his own money and getting respect from ppl... Now he is a proud owner of a Dhaba, which is named after his... But he himself brought a bad name for the dhaba... all the customers were walking out bcos of the arrest...

Originally posted by: mnsu

Prats is a judgemental human being . Takes into consideration the past deeds and overall reputation of the person into consideration, when coming to conclusion of the events that she did not witness. In fact the whole Pratigya cast is except Krishna, Komal and SS (to some extent - not completely). Showing an un-baised, non-judgemental lead is beyond the scope of Pratigya CVs

iam sorry msnu, Now we r also being judgmental on P, Ok, going with ur point... if a person killed someone and he has been brought b4 law...the judge may see his past deeds and his respect in the society and he can only reduce the punishment to an extent... but it is not tht this crime is acceptable... tht situation and tht time matters the most...

Originally posted by: carisma2

Thanks Anu,

I agree with your legal input.. Provocation in defense is in the case of murder or manslaughter. Howeven there was a semi english film called provoked in which Ash kills her her hubby accidently possible, because she was provoked by his bad behaviour towards her.. She got off because she was 'provoked'. But yes that doesn't work in all cases.

Krish's act was provoked.. and in the interim he did have time to re-think. Now when Pratigya gave him the idea of getting his business back up.. he's already comminted the deed.. so it was a bit late. Though she did talk to him before- but he hadn't had a chance to clear his mind and all her advise was wasted.

This is a sticky situation.. where Raadhe is a character that just doesn't learn... It will be interesting to see that how the cv's will deal with his character.

I would also like to see, Pratigya's input on how to deal with Raade.. she has shown him a way forward with the business.. but now it remains to be seen how she expects to deal with Raade.

My only concern is that in the past.. Pratigya has been unable to punish the wrong doers effectively.

She tried - But they beat the system.

In her own way she is right... At the moment the cv's are showing that Pratigya is stuck between her principles and Patni Daram. Coz as far as I think Patni Daram goes - you have to support your husband no matter what... as far as I think.

hmm would like to say one thing dears loving each and every discussion discuss ur povs some will suppot krishna some will support pratigya but in the end we are all kriya lovers like kriya are inseparable we r also so discuss ur povs i did mine also but dont take anything to heart b calm and syay happy love u all🤗