Did we misunderstand yesterday??

eveline thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 14 years ago
#1
I carefully listened to the doctor's ultimatum to Maan....repeatedly listened to it today....and have a doubt............
Did we misunderstand the statement yesterday????
Was the Doctor trying to say that we cannot save both....coz all medical treatments meted to a pregnant woman is keeping in mind that the child does not come to harm....was she trying to say that ..we cannot save Geet keeping the pregnancy in mind....please be ready to let go of the child in order to save Geet's life...is that what she meant by choice between Geet and the baby???
The choice....if we try to save both...then none will survive...if we dont care for the child then Geet will survive.....
Did we all jump the gun and misinterpret.....or was it colossal ignorance on the cv's part?
Edited by eveline - 14 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

13

Views

1.4k

Users

9

Likes

14

Frequent Posters

priyachand thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 14 years ago
#2
No i don't think we misunderstood! i don't know whether it was deliberate ploy of the cvs for trp rates. Or it could be they made an error and with the furore we all created they averted it in today's episode. if you remember when the doctor tells the dialogue, her back is shown not her face. They just changed the dialogues. i think it could be either of this
bobby13rocks thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 14 years ago
#3
Me,too felt in the same way.May be we misinterpreted the doctor.
eveline thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 14 years ago
#4

Originally posted by: priyachand

No i don't think we misunderstood! i don't know whether it was deliberate ploy of the cvs for trp rates. Or it could be they made an error and with the furore we all created they averted it in today's episode. if you remember when the doctor tells the dialogue, her back is shown not her face. They just changed the dialogues. i think it could be either of this

possibly...its a grey area..if its a correction due to our responses on the site......great and we should keep it up !!!
daisyluv thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#5
maybe the doc was dumb..n had no idea wh she was tlkin abt...LMAO
eveline thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 14 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: bobby13rocks

Me,too felt in the same way.May be we misinterpreted the doctor.

i went back and checked too....my confusion led to this post😕!!
eveline thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 14 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: sanaya11

maybe the doc was dumb..n had no idea wh she was tlkin abt...LMAO

😆...thats the most convenient explanation...blame it on the doc😉!!
euphoric thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 14 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: eveline

possibly...its a grey area..if its a correction due to our responses on the site......great and we should keep it up !!!



i so felt the same thing... they edited their blunder and rectified it😆... good der se sahi akal toh aayi... the dialogues were clearly edited and if you notice carefully there is a voice modulation too that happens there.
eveline thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 14 years ago
#9

Originally posted by: euphoric



i so felt the same thing... they edited their blunder and rectified it😆... good der se sahi akal toh aayi... the dialogues were clearly edited and if you notice carefully there is a voice modulation too that happens there.

😉Good going Sherlock!!😆..mystery solved!!
12564 thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#10

Originally posted by: eveline

I carefully listened to the doctor's ultimatum to Maan....repeatedly listened to it today....and have a doubt............

Did we misunderstand the statement yesterday????
Was the Doctor trying to say that we cannot save both....coz all medical treatments meted to a pregnant woman is keeping in mind that the child does not come to harm....was she trying to say that ..we cannot save Geet keeping the pregnancy in mind....please be ready to let go of the child in order to save Geet's life...is that what she meant by choice between Geet and the baby???
The choice....if we try to save both...then none will survive...if we dont care for the child then Geet will survive.....
Did we all jump the gun and misinterpret.....or was it colossal ignorance on the cv's part?

if we see logic we will become mad😆

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".