pratigya changed??

Page

Miss_Random

@Miss_Random

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 14 years ago

welll we all know since the beginning pratigya used to fight if something worse was happening, even the 1st promo, where she talks againnst the boys who tried to flirt with her friend/? if im not wrong

n even wen komal beated up the boys who were trying to flirt with her sassu ma, even then pratigya said that yes bhabhi was right, ese logo ko rokna chhaiye, otherwise they wont stop misbehaving with people, so whyyyyyyyyy did she turn against krishna? wen he did a gud thing with beating up the man which was a thief, she was always against people who misbehave with someone n she was the one who standed up to fight for her right, so what now??? where was kirshna wrong??

Edited by Abida0210 - 14 years ago

Quote

Frequent Posters

Dyehard

@Dyehard

Navigator

Posted: 14 years ago

Originally posted by: Abida0210
welll we all know since the beginning pratigya used to fight if something worse was happening, even the 1st promo, where she talks againnst the boys who tried to flirt with her friend/? if im not wrong

n even wen komal beated up the boys who were trying to flirt with her sassu ma, even then pratigya said that yes bhabhi was right, ese logo ko rokna chhaiye, otherwise they wont stop misbehaving with people, so whyyyyyyyyy did she turn against krishna? wen he did a gud thing with beating up the man which was a thief, she was always against people who misbehave with someone n she was the one who standed up to fight for her right, so what now??? where was kirshna wrong??

Krishna was not wrong to catch the thief or even give him a thwack or two. But there is a world of difference between Komal's chappal or Pratigya's slap and Krishna's ghusa. It was not catching him that was wrong but the manner in which he dealt with him later. Krishna is a very powerful man, agar usne gusse mein kuch zyada maar diya (jo woh kar raha tha) tab insaan ki jaan bhi ja sakti hain, The same goes for the crowd, one or two blows, are somewhat alright just to cow the thief till you hand him over, but sometimes crowds can get very vicious. It is not uncommon for crowds in small towns to beat a man to death for a relatively small offense. It is just a matter of getting carried away with your own strength. If K had just given him a couple and handed him over to the police, matters would have been ok. But he was hell-bent on pupling him in a "Street justice" manner which is quite unnecessary. Agar woh mar jata tho kis ki zimmedari hoti? Even if he had to be hospitalised with severe injuries, kyon zimmedar hota?
P can't stand and watch while her husband beats a man to death, even if he is a small time offender, na?

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

shumshad parveen

@shumi.

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 14 years ago

Originally posted by: Abida0210
welll we all know since the beginning pratigya used to fight if something worse was happening, even the 1st promo, where she talks againnst the boys who tried to flirt with her friend/? if im not wrong

n even wen komal beated up the boys who were trying to flirt with her sassu ma, even then pratigya said that yes bhabhi was right, ese logo ko rokna chhaiye, otherwise they wont stop misbehaving with people, so whyyyyyyyyy did she turn against krishna? wen he did a gud thing with beating up the man which was a thief, she was always against people who misbehave with someone n she was the one who standed up to fight for her right, so what now??? where was kirshna wrong??

great analysis yaar👏...you are right ' she was always against who misbehave with someone n she was the one who stands up to fight for her right, ....'

a small correction in your statement according to her the person who misbehaves changes from time to time place to place😆....today the person who misbehaved was krishna....😆 hence she stood up against him to fight for the right....😆 😆😆 or may be for the thief's right...😆 😆

Edited by shumi. - 14 years ago