Pratigya is NOT breaking anyone's house!!!!!!!!

Originally posted by: *queenme*

why cant she appologize to make thing ok?? will she become smaller by doing so?? a daughter-in-law is not supposed to humiliate her husband or husband's family in public... that is called batameezee... why is she allowed to slap anyone she wants... if im not mistaken, didnt she slap angad and krishna on different occasions when she felt they were wrong??? so why is she so furious if krishna did the same?? she is not a good daughter-in-law and that is because she is not a good wife... why will her sasuraal walas accept her when she hasnt accepted her husband or them for that matter?? a a sasur cannot b a father until the bahu behaves like a daughter simple as that... sorry but this had to said..also, i agree that amma is totally negative from the begining but what has everyone else done to her?? nothing... so y is she so stubborn??

Originally posted by: SonyaBlade

Okay I think I have tolerated to my breaking point everything that has been said about Pratigya. And this is the sad thing about our society,

- the daughter in law is always the one who takes all of the blame and gets all of the blame.

- The Daughter in law is supposed to be the one who treats everyone with respect and yet gets no respect in return.

- The daughter in law is supposed to consider her husband her Bhagwan and yet the husband, he can do whatever he wants and no one will say anything.

- the daughter in law is expected to take over all household responsibilities and get no recognition for it,

- the daughter in law can never make a mistake

- the daughter in law can never express her own opinions

- the daughter in law can never complain nor have any expectations, she must always just expect her lot in life and take everything that hits her

- the daughter in law must never speak up against anyone even if they are doing wrong.

This is what I have gathered in the following posts that have been said about Pratigya. She is the house breaker, she has too much pride to apologize, she should have just done what they wanted her to do......and I'm not realy even sure if its worth it to respond but here I am anyways.

From personal experience I have to say its very easy to blame a daughter in law. She's the outsider, she's the one who has taken their precious boy and turned him against his own family......WTF??????????

In this case can anyone seriously say that Prats has made Krishna do what he has done. She had no idea that SS would humiliate her to this degree....

Does no one agree with me that it is SS and Amma's job to be the guidance in a household...to be the people who hold it together by any means necessary instead of plotting to break it apart. Its not Pratigya who is breaking this family apart its SS and Amma who have done it themselves. Dadi is the only one who actually has half a brain in that household. Why should the elders demand an apology when they really should guide PRatigya and tell her waht exactly she has done wrong and how it hurt them. BUT OF COURSE because they are Thakurs they can never ever explain anything like rational people and whose fault is that, definitely NOT PRATIGYA'S.

NONE OF THIS IS HER FAULT. Pratigya shouldn't be the one who has to be the example to this junglee family...that's something taht is expected from the elders in a family. If they can't even do that then how can we expect anything from Pratigya. She put in alot of energy to be a good daughter in law....she cooked, cleaned, did everythign for Kesar and whatever Amma asked her to do she did w/o talking back.

If someone actually told her what she did wrong then I'm positive she would apologize, but they seem to fail to realize that the only reason why she said she was going to leave the house is because Krishna hit her and humiliated her.....we don't see SS and Amma telling Krishna that he shouldn't have hit her. NO ONE should make an excuse of the fact that SS and Amma don't know any better because that IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH. They are the elder people and they should have enough sense in them to realize that Pratigya comes from a differnet background and therefore she will not accept being hit by her husband. They should advise Krishna on how to handle his wife w/o hitting her......NOT JUSTIFY his actions and always blame Prats.

I am not impressed with this blaming Pratigya nonsense because the true sinners of this fiasco are SS and Amma and I dont' care if they are Thakurs or not.....they have seen alot more of lief and should know what to do alot better than the way they are dealing with all of this. Krishna for once actually has half a brain and is taking Krishna away....that was HIS decision and not hers.....

Originally posted by: *queenme*

why cant she appologize to make thing ok??

An apology wouldn't do anything for the Singhs. They would still continue to blame her for every fallout. Then, why would she bother? will she become smaller by doing so?? She wouldn't get smaller, but the problem would remain. A sorry isn't an instant fix to a issue. It would be like how Krishna said his saarry to Pratigya because he thought it would bring her back and how that saarry didn't work. a daughter-in-law is not supposed to humiliate her husband or husband's family in public...She didn't humiliate anyone. Instead, the Singh family has been hellbent upon embarrassing her. Even at the pooja, how she said "I haven't let him touch me", that was no big news. Amma knew that their marriage hadn't been consummated on their wedding night. Just because they went on a honeymoon, everything is supposedly getting a magic-fix and be rainbows and butterflies? I don't think so. that is called batameezee... why is she allowed to slap anyone she wants... if im not mistaken, didnt she slap angad and krishna on different occasions when she felt they were wrong??? She's not allowed to hit anyone without a reason and she didn't. Angad said something inapproriate to her and that's why she slapped him. Krishna embarrased the crap out of her during the engagement. Hence, the slap he got from her. so why is she so furious if krishna did the same?? The problem here is that he slapped her because the "revelation" about their marriage bed threatened and belittled his status. That slap was not given to Pratigya because she was wrong, but because she had made him look like "nothing" in front of everyone. she is not a good daughter-in-law and that is because she is not a good wife... why will her sasuraal walas accept her when she hasnt accepted her husband or them for that matter?? a a sasur cannot b a father until the bahu behaves like a daughter simple as that... I have a feeling that if Pratigya would've bursted way before than when she actually did, people still would've blamed her for being a "bad" DIL. Isn't tolerating a whole bunch of BS the part of a good DIL? How about cooking? Cleaning? If she's bad, then how would you categorize Komal, who has done worse and a lot of more than Pratigya has? sorry but this had to said..also, i agree that amma is totally negative from the begining but what has everyone else done to her?? nothing... so y is she so stubborn?? Amma's problem is about power. She wants absolute control over her favorite son, Krishna. Therefore, she's threatened by Pratigya and the "influence" she has over Krishna (if any). I don't understand her and she gets on my nerves. 🤢🤢

Originally posted by: *queenme*

why cant she appologize to make thing ok?? will she become smaller by doing so?? a daughter-in-law is not supposed to humiliate her husband or husband's family in public... that is called batameezee... why is she allowed to slap anyone she wants... if im not mistaken, didnt she slap angad and krishna on different occasions when she felt they were wrong??? so why is she so furious if krishna did the same?? she is not a good daughter-in-law and that is because she is not a good wife... why will her sasuraal walas accept her when she hasnt accepted her husband or them for that matter?? a a sasur cannot b a father until the bahu behaves like a daughter simple as that... sorry but this had to said..also, i agree that amma is totally negative from the begining but what has everyone else done to her?? nothing... so y is she so stubborn??

Originally posted by: NZkiwi

Why is Pratigya being blamed for not apologising.She is the one who is wronged against

1. She was forced to marry against her will

Krishna had come with a gun after her when she tried to leave the town with her father

2.Even if Krishna was not responsible for all the mishaps but he hasnt been a bed of roses either.He did his bit to force her in his way

3. Mother in law has an axe to grind with Pratigya from day 1...She even threatened Kesar if she stays too friendly with Pratigya.Pratigya has been humiliated so many times in her inlaws house for no reason like she was not allowed to go pooja in her parents house and not even allowed to phone them or rudely commented on by the maid

4.Even her name was being forced to changed

5 Worst was her false pregnancy.Pregnancy is as sacred and important to a woman as manhood to a man.When Krishna can raise hell for this why cant she for this huge cruel treatment for her so called pregnancy

I would like to ask all Pratigya Bashers why would any women want to get married ,,if she is treated like a second class citizen in her husband's house with a long list of dos and donts/

This is not Sanskaar...

The first Sanskaar for any human being irrespective of caste,creed ,religion or nationality is to respect another human being..

Even if that person is a stranger.

Then how can a daughter in law not be respected for herself.

By the way,,, this serial is awesome and brings out really excellent points about treatment of women in India...

AND my congratulations to all actors of the serial

You all are mind blowing...Rocking performances