Religion vs. Science - Page 27

Originally posted by: Summer3

I think when politics is involved with either religion or science then trouble starts.

By themselves they are fine.

Originally posted by: Emptiness

Pareidolia - is a psychological phenomenon involving a vague and random stimulus (often an image or sound) being perceived as significant. Common examples include seeing images of animals or faces in clouds, the man-in-the moon etc. - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareidolia

Although that honey-comb one looks doctored.

If those pictures are evidence for the truth of Islam, then what would you say to this...





and what do you see here... mods take note.. these are not explicit images, they are just random forest pictures, if you see something else in these pictures, then you have a dirty perverted mind.





is this a ballet dancer?





I see you posted this pic also, a tree praying in the Islamic style..



but ofcourse, this picture could very well be....


A praying tree. This one facing Amarnath maybe?

Originally posted by: debayon

And all of these prove that God exist?😕 It's called natural variation, nature provides for diversity within a species. Have you ever realized that these symbols and signs, be it Islamic or not, have been made by man himself. It's not like God himself came down and self-imposed that OK, this means Allah and that means Jai Mata Di.

Originally posted by: rabees011

Did I say that everyone should embrace Islam? Did I force my religious views by sharing those pics? No. Even others have posted some pics of their Gods, so I decided to share some pics of Islamic miracles. That's it. Why are you asking me "What do you say to this?" Did I not tell you I am just willing to share these pics with the members who are debating in this post?

I just want to say that all these pictures do show that God exists. You asked me what I would say to these pics. This is what my answer is: God exists, though he is intangible.

Originally posted by: Emptiness

You completely missed the point. You're claiming that these are "miracles" of Islam, and I provided you with a natural explanation of how humans can misperceive vague or obscure stimulus as something clear and distinct. It is a psychological phenomenon called Pareidolia, which is the result of the human mind's tendency to pick recognizable imagery out of chaotic forms. I posted a few examples of images that can misperceived for something else.

And Islam considers itself to be the only "true" religion, how then do you explain the OM symbol on the cow, do you recognise Hinduism as a true religion?

Originally posted by: Emptiness

You completely missed the point. You're claiming that these are "miracles" of Islam, and I provided you with a natural explanation of how humans can misperceive vague or obscure stimulus as something clear and distinct. It is a psychological phenomenon called Pareidolia, which is the result of the human mind's tendency to pick recognizable imagery out of chaotic forms. I posted a few examples of images that can misperceived for something else.

And Islam considers itself to be the only "true" religion, how then do you explain the OM symbol on the cow, do you recognise Hinduism as a true religion?

Originally posted by: rabees011

You are once again misunderstanding me. This post was opened to debate on the topic of existence of God. I did not say Islam must be embraced by everyone! Did I? I just told you that all these things do indicate that God exists. That's it. This is my opinion and if you want to stick to your opinion, go ahead but please don't question my belief and other people's beliefs in a way that may sound offensive. That's all. Everyone is entitled to their own belief. If I believe in something, do you have to believe in the same thing? No. Similarly, if you believe in something which you think is right, then that doesn't necessarily mean I have to believe which you believe to be right. That's it. Therefore, you stand by your opinion no matter what, and I will stand by my opinion no matter what. If you believe in your religion and its miracles, then you will stand by your religion no matter what. Similarly, if I believe in God and my religion, then I will stand by it no matter what. That's it. Why am I being questioned again and again that how do I know those pictures are correct? I just wanted to share some pics of Islamic miracles. That's it. I didn't mention anything like Islam is superior than Hinduism or Hinduism is superior than Islam. That's my point. I just wanted to share some pics with the members here. That's all. What wrong did I do?

IF is a reputed website that believes in freedom of speech, not abuse of the freedom of speech. As far as I think, I haven't abused this freedom. I have the right to post pics that represent my religion as long as they don't offend anyone. That's all. I have no intention of declaring any religion as being the most authentic out of Islam, Christianity, Hinduism, Judaism or Buddhism. If I think those pictures are pictures of Islamic miracles, then you should not try to impose your belief on me. If I want to believe in something, then I will. If you want to believe in something which is contradictory to my belief, then go ahead. No problem, but you must keep in my mind that the authenticity of a religion and its miracles shouldn't be questioned as it can create fights and lead to open bashing.

Please refrain from creating a controversy that might offend others. I think we are getting off topic. So let's just stick to what we were discussing earlier: Whether God exists or not and science versus religion/religion versus science.I would really appreciate it if you can get back on track and refrain from questioning the authenticity of any religion as it might offend others.

Originally posted by: Summer3

Mr. Cuckoocutter is religion and Debu Buoy is Science, now each is dependent on the other to have some tamasha and fun. 😆 Lage raho Munna Bhai.