Immunity for the good singers

As much as I hated Fame Gurukul at times, the one thing that appealed about the show was the 'judgment process'. Instead of putting all the contestants at the mercy of the janta, the judges selected three singers every week who sang poorly.

If the same format was allowed in II2, contestants like Meenal, Amey, Antara and Karyuna would be saved week after week since they usually receive good comments from the judges. This would guarantee some immunity for talented singers, if anything.

Just a thought. Of course, FG got dirty with the judges versus contestants battle and it tended to influence their decisions.

That's a great idea , if the judges can stay pure

I agree, sonya 😊
I wish we could take up the good points from both shows & came up with a show whre deserving one's would win!
Alas, not possible

Sorry guys but i dont agree......
my point is that janta should be allowed to choose the whole way. After all it's their idol(our idol)! If someone who deserved but got out because of janta's decision really has talent then they will come into the music industry and make name........so indian idol ruling system is perfect.
Plus another point is that last year(just like this year)many cribbed on here as their favourite had exited but finally Abhijeet Sawant the winner was deserving and had talent.He is one of the famous ones in the industry now! 😳

Sorry guys but i dont agree......
my point is that janta should be allowed to choose the whole way. After all it's their idol(our idol)! If someone who deserved but got out because of janta's decision really has talent then they will come into the music industry and make name........so indian idol ruling system is perfect.
Plus another point is that last year(just like this year)many cribbed on here as their favourite had exited but finally Abhijeet Sawant the winner was deserving and had talent.He is one of the famous ones in the industry now! 😳

How about negative voting?
Instead of voting whom you think sang well - in which the opinion varies widely between people and some might vote for only one contestant eventhough they think some others were OK but not bad enough to leave the contest early - why not make the people vote for the person they think should be voted out. And the person with the most votes get voted out !

Originally posted by: sonaahana

Sorry guys but i dont agree......
my point is that janta should be allowed to choose the whole way. After all it's their idol(our idol)! If someone who deserved but got out because of janta's decision really has talent then they will come into the music industry and make name........so indian idol ruling system is perfect.
Plus another point is that last year(just like this year)many cribbed on here as their favourite had exited but finally Abhijeet Sawant the winner was deserving and had talent.He is one of the famous ones in the industry now! 😳

I AGREE 100% .. WE SHOULD AGREE WITH JANTA ... I AM SAYING THIS EVEN AFTER LOSING ONE OF MY FAVORITE CONTESTANT LAST WEEK .... AND I AM SURE MONALI IS GOING TO MAKE A GOOD NAME FOR HER EVEN IF RAVI BECOMES INDIAL IDOL

I think better method is 50-50...judges & public...

As sonya says that way SONY wont get much votes since they r telling next day result....In FG there is enough days to vote too...


Anyways HOPE that teh best Person win teh title & it wont be ravi sandeep & anuj....