A Fair Question? - Page 6

Originally posted by: ankit_nyc

</div>
<div>Arey nahin I just voted for Shakti, didn't want her elimination on my conscience. I mean I know one vote is not gonna do all that much but still ek kalakar ka hosla badhana chahiye, that's what I believe in 😆

Nahi yaar, aapke ek vote se woh top vote getter nahi bann jayegee..shayad us ek vote ke kam padne ke vajah se Dharmesh eliminate ho jaaye..to kahayl rakhna.. 😆

Originally posted by: sunandshine

Nahi yaar, aapke ek vote se woh top vote getter nahi bann jayegee..shayad us ek vote ke kam padne ke vajah se Dharmesh eliminate ho jaaye..to kahayl rakhna.. 😆

Originally posted by: ankit_nyc

😕 hmmm again that's your opinion that you are entitled to just like it's my opinion along with the public that Shakti is over hyped and over rated and hence she wasn't anywhere close to the top 3 vote getters last week 😊 I believe that the format is fair, I am all for public voting. In fact I always ask people who think the format is unfair a simple question to which quite frankly i've never gotten a good answer and that is, "if the show is rigged, unfair, and biased towards one contestant then why are you watching the show"? 😆

why do you feel public feels the same way as you? just because shakti wasnt the top most voted doesnt mean they feel she is overhyped. you seem to have appointed youself as representative of the public, but if you are a puneet fan and you believe that public agrees with you then puneet should be the top most vote getter 😉 i have even asked before how come you are always advocating dharmesh and praising dharmesh when you claim you are puneet's fan but i never seem to get any reply to this question. god help puneet if all his fans are like you, no wonder the guy is never on top. I believe a lot of people have tried to answer your question, and just because they fail to convince you does not mean they are wrong. because you follow that line of reasoning anything that doesnt agree with you is always wrong, which i find to remarkably ignorant, which i sincerely hope you are not. people like and praise their favs, and you do the same, but please for god sakes dont go around insulting other people's favs and their choices on every post they make.

In my opinion, someone is overhyped when they get a lot of extra air-time. Or just continous talks about him/her on the show.

For me, Dharmesh just seems overhyped by judges 😆.

Since Mega Auditions actually...the whole thing with "i wanted Remo as my mentor."

And then there's the whole Saumya-Dharmesh love thing going on
But he seems so bhola bhala...it's not like he's asking to be talked about.


I dont see Shakti as being overhyped 😕
Does getting the most "Performance of the Day Awards" qualify her for being overhyped? She's just getting rewarded for her awesome performances =]

Originally posted by: Jess.

In my opinion, someone is overhyped when they get a lot of extra air-time. Or just continous talks about him/her on the show.

For me, Dharmesh just seems overhyped by judges 😆.

Since Mega Auditions actually...the whole thing with "i wanted Remo as my mentor."

And then there's the whole Saumya-Dharmesh love thing going on
But he seems so bhola bhala...it's not like he's asking to be talked about.


I dont see Shakti as being overhyped 😕
Does getting the most "Performance of the Day Awards" qualify her for being overhyped? She's just getting rewarded for her awesome performances =]

yes from what i see dharmesh seems like a nice guy, doesnt come off as arrogant. saw his comments on youtube once, not sure if it was him or not, but from the comments too he seemed nice. but yes, spending too much of air time on one person is the way over hyping is done, not saying he isnt talented, but the competition should keep everyone on the same plane.

Originally posted by: ankit_nyc

Okay i may be naive but people keep saying that Zee is over hyping certain contestants like Dharmesh and Shakti. My question is, what would Zee get by overhyping only 2 contestants out of 11. Meaning why did they pick Shakti and Dharmesh to overhype and not for example Kishore or Punit? What difference does it make to Zee if Shakti wins as opposed to Punit or if Dharmesh wins as opposed to Tashu? I mean Dharmesh and Shakti are not from zones that tend to vote in high numbers to begin with. Dharmesh is from Baroda, not a traditionally high voting zone and Shakti I believe is from Mumbai or Delhi in either case both cities don't vote well in these kind of shows. So why would Zee select these 2 contestants to overhype and not someone else? This is where the whole show is rigged theory falls apart for me. I don't see how Zee benefits from a particular contestant winning or losing.

What is people getting hyping Terrence & TKT in forum?