the whole problem is that "misunderstandings" r co-incidental..nothing is logical here specially the reactions of characters.....
all of a sudden daddaji realized vishambhar is right..if they showed this same track ( both the families r trying to make them talk ) at the time when Vishambhar came for the first time to talk to Daddaji, wouldn't it look better and more logical? is there any justification for this stupidity ke naitik wanted akshara back with him and when she came back, he ignored her? didn't stop her? they didn't talk? and akshara went back? 🤢 what kind of SULAH r they talking about? HOW will it happen? shivratri was the best opportunity for them to talk...
Basically they have no story...they work around the plot. In reality any parent would first give a thrashing to their son if they got to know that he asked his wife to leave the house in the middle of the night.
Here Naitik wasnt even made to feel that he had made a mistake....infact they used that as a weapon to target Akshara. They turned the tables round...everything that Naitik did was in anger...etc...everything was justified. If Naitik can ask Akshara to leave the house in the night in anger then even Aksh can walk out in anger. Nobody asked the children why they did what they did....the elders were acting like kindergarten kids. Even now they are doing everyhting behind their back....untill Naitik realises what his mistake is, he is not going to talk or apologise 😃 😃. We seem to know Naitik much better than the CVs
36