Why favour one Son?

Page

divan

@divan

Rocker

Posted: 16 years ago

Why did Keshu give POA in Ketan's name only? There was Ketki and Mehul too. The POA of should have been in Ketki's name or in Joint name of Mehul and Ketan. Ketan had yet to prove that he can handle the business. Keshu is partly responsible for what will happen to him and his family now.

Quote

Frequent Posters

saba

@luv_pavi

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 16 years ago

agree wit u he shud giv POA to ketki or mehol

saba

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

suwas

@suwas

Inactive

Posted: 16 years ago

Ketki is not much involved in business so its okay not o include her. But Mehul.....why did Keshu ignore his rights?

Quote

Pooja

@pooja_l

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 16 years ago

yes..but its the faith which did all....trusting ketan, yes keshu did the mistake

Quote

SuganthiS

@SuganthiS

Voyager

+ 2

Posted: 16 years ago

I think that it happens to many of us at times, we miscalculate and take decisions. Keshu has also miscalculated and handed POA to Ketan. Maybe he felt that Ketan has that leadership quality and would work alongside Mehul. But yes, it was a wrong decision on Keshu's part and I guess, Keshu and Ketki are going to pay dearly for it...😭!

Edited by suganthirani - 16 years ago

Quote

shelly

@desilife4eva

Inactive

Posted: 16 years ago

yea!!! that was a n extremely idiotic move

Quote

@curry-sistah

Navigator

Posted: 16 years ago

yea i agree.

he made such a stupid move. when he knew ketan does stupid stuff/ and caused the fam to be in distress, y wud he give ketan the POA. lame...

im just curious.. i dont even think it is possible for a person to tranfer ALL property in their name without signatures/ and stuff. c'mon! it cant be that ez.

Quote

divan

@divan

Rocker

Posted: 16 years ago

Usually with POA, there are clause when the legal paper is effective. Just suppose your parents are ill and they want to give you power of attorney than there must be a clause to say, that you have a right to make a decision on their behalf when they are ill. But it is not that simple because the clause has to be state down each and every or specific conditions when someone can make decision on your behalf. I think if someone says that only when they are mentally incapable, then if you end up in hospital and are physically disabled, the POA would not count. I mean in soaps they take liberties with laws, medical condition and everything else...only our silly minds comes with the abusurd questions...

Quote

Why favour one Son?

Related Topics

Explore Topics