DOTW l Vidding: Underappreciated ? - Page 2

hey lovely discussion... I make both siggies and VMs so one thing i can tell is that VM making is much harder then siggy making, it takes me 2-3 days sumtimes even tho i dnt make much of effects Vm's i like it simple and still it takes me ages to make it then recheck it etc... choosing the scenes, syncing with the songs its hell much harder then siggy making! but its reli njoyable and if u like the song it becomes easier coz u have to listen to it again and again lolzzz but its an art wich is beautiful and i learnt of bettering it in IF so i luv IF for that!

Lovely discussion!

Nadz

Originally posted by: -Neetz-

Now, for me, the obvious question is that why is it that people think that vidding is a skill that any layman can master ? That all one needs is a computer with WMM installed on it to be called a 'vidder' or 'VM maker' ? Why is vidding underappreciated when sites like YouTube are full of extremely talented and imaginative vidders ? Afterall, once can create a whole new story, a tale, a chronicle with a software as simple as WMM.

Originally posted by: -Rajveer-

I have to agree .. VM making is easier I feel! Coz i cannot make signatures at all.. VMs are something I can do best if I have the right songs, scenes and mood!! If everything is perfect then all falls into place eventually.. and I dont think VMs are underappreciated not especially on I-F because if it was then this forum wouldnt have had so many hits rite?

To start with,.....superb topic Neeta di...:)