Criticism of religion & blind Faith: your opinion? - Page 3

Originally posted by: PhoeniXof_Hades

Made sense (except for the bold statement; care to clarify it? Why would a blind follower of a particular Faith label another blind follower of its own Faith as non-believer?). And I agree fully. Question is, how does one educate the nation and the society that the true faith lies between believing in one's religion after questioning and testing it, and not by closing the eyes?

@ labib- my siggy says it all about blind faith ..LOL.. but blind faith is diff from faith. It shud allow some questioning at least.

Originally posted by: Gauri_3

Option 2 should be "Religion should allowed to be QUESTIONED........criticism is a harsh word for any religion.

Agree with u Gauri Ji

POH i don't get the point of ur debate buddy

simiply when one has faith it isn't followed blindly the teachings of that faith esp the major religions of the world have been around for thousands of years and when those religions began the followers gained knowledge thru God and so to follow a faith does not mean follow it blindly because the foundations are sound but God gave us all brains to learn knowledge about ones faith to make ourself better in what we believe.

the word choice is incorrect here it shudn't be Criticise in option to but question as Gauri ji pointed out because one should question how ones faith came about thru reading the scriptures of the religion they follow and so as to make themselves the best followers of that religion possible or at least strive to be better

so for me personally im not going to vote because i believe in option 1 and Gauri ji's option 2 equally

apologies if i went of on a tangent here or if ive repeated myself

questioning gives rise to more questions. what if U arrive at the truth? That cud B disastrous. So blind faith any day 😆