Originally posted by: Rdigest
Why is Viks reaction based on his own memories is justified and a completely different reaction by Abhi is also justified????
Did Vikrant do anything when he got those flashes and no clear images until the wedding day 8 years ago? Nope he didn't, he asked his family around him and believed their lies until Vish brought out the truth and him getting clear flashes. It's the same here, he has been getting flashes but no clear images until he ended up in the hospital. He asked Ankit and he lied by EB him, Vikrant even asked for proof from Ankit.
Vik as a person would not entertain or encourage physical harm, body shaming or mistreatment to anyone.
Exactly, with no memories and nothing to rely on he could only show his displeasure, apologize, make them feel better which he did with the teacher and Vibha. He is not the confident Vikrant whose 1 roar can shut down the whole SM. He was someone with no memories, relying on them, indebted to them and being EB every second if he went against them and reminded of their favors. To put into perspective, think of how DK EM & physically abused Mannat into putting down Vikrant int he court and how he abused Vikrant for no reason infront of Mannat multiple times. Did Mannat speak up for Vikrant or did she even stand up for herself against the abuse? No, She stood there even when DK said DuMan were objects and he will do whatever he wants. She infact defended DK when Vikrant tried to interfere.
We all supported Vik when he threw out Mannat RoTu (pre leap) because he had memory recall and realisee Mannat hid Aman truth from him. Rest of it is a domino effect which we have discussed to shreds.
I don't believe anyone from the forum supported Vikrant and called out Mannat for deceiving Vikrant for DK/RoTu. Infact, forum even expected Vikrant to immediately accept the apology for such deception and complete the wedding when all Vikrant requested Mannat was to never hide anything from him. When he questioned Mannat why she was supporting DK so much when he should have been her priority, forum declared he CA her.
Some of us did support Vikrant and we went silent because of the snarky remarks by calling opinions which didn't align with them as childish and offscreen Neetu's. I for one find such snarky comments very funny and have a good laugh
. I even had a good laugh when I read posts supporting DK abusing Mannat on the forum, such love and dedication for DK
.
I don't understand this desperate need to gloss over Abhimanyus poor writing just because he is played by Adnan.
I have no issue with Abhi character writint though I didn't care for the leap. I personally don't route for actors , only support or not support characters. So, not sure who this is intended for. I have called out Vikrant in multiple tracks prior to DK's entry , even with the Y wedding drama I called him out. But, when I call out Mannat & how she was ruined since DK entry, I am suddenly Adnan supporter.
Anyways Chao, kitchen duties and dinner calling before I go watch DK drugging Mannat
Thank you for indirectly answering what I wanted to hear and point out as bias 🤪 (not just you but all those who read it)
Pink... exactly this is why I call out Abhi. Vik trusted his family's version of events. Or rather Vishs version of events because his memories were supporting that. And for that matter neither Neetu nor Mannat ever denied it unlike Ankit who couldnt show him any proof of Abhis childhood. Did Vik put Ankit or SR through the ringer like he did Mannat???? No... he simply accepted the convulated explanation that the pictures are in Punjab. As if Ankit couldnt arrange the proofs for Mannat.
Thats the contradiction Vik/Abhi has and why supporting Abhi makes no sense.
Abhi had memories... in vivid details, he found something missing with MR but did not trust Mannat who was able to show him concrete proofs.
Thats double standards from the audience who defends Abhi.
Blue I agree and I called it out then. So i am going to ignore that you meant me here.
Red... I did... vociferously and I was the only one at the beginning who supported why Vik was behaving like this.
Green... Mannat did not support DK... she supported Neetu... who threatened suicide and bind her in a pact. Or do we forget that Mannat desperately wanted to reveal????
It was clear as day then that Mannat chose a lesser evil mother... one the public hails now because she was Viks true mother. So in hindsight Mannat did support the right side at the cost of her own happiness.
It wasn't Mannats truth to share to begin with, Neetu threw her under the bus in haldi, never told Vik that it was she who asked Mannat to lie and agreed to hide everything from him. Thats the only reason why Neetu remained pro Mannat till the very end. Because Mannat supported her at her worst phase.
So if anyone is at equal fault if not bigger then its Neetu. Call her out as much as you call out and blame Mannat. Simply because she died saving Vik doesn't exonerate her from her deeds which also involved drugging that same cherished boy.
And lets not forget Neetu is the original creator of this mess. Had she never lied about Amans , none of this would have happened.
Bold... without the knowledge about pregnancy... saying Mannat is choosing his brother over him and hinting at two timing him is not CA then God knows what is... forum did not declare it, he actually said those words which earned him a slap... Vik has till date not apologized to her for that or putting her through so much trouble when she was pregnant with Dua. A bare minimum acknowledgement hasnt even happened.
Purple... the original tweet on which this conversation started was about Abhi and not Mannat. I dont have to agree with you or the select few that Abhi is a cute and loveable character when neither the majority or the actors themselves dont like him. He doesnt have the good traits Vik had which shouldnt be the case even with memory loss. Its not rebirth.
The core reason why there can never be a consensus on this is some of you believe DK acted on Dadis words and stole everything from Vik. I do not give weight to a characters words who did not even feature for probably more than 10 episodes.
Neither do the makers.... as per episodes... DK started having feelings in Indore... 7 years ago and not 8.... so the entire premise that he wanted to steal Mannat pre leap does not work out well. Till they clarify it further though I doubt it will ever happen.
That said, Mannat never gave any hopes to DK that she would choose him over Vik or marry him in future. The Chai sessions everyone rants about are all about how Mannat is still hung up on Vik, Vik is biological father of Dua, Mannat traumatized that Vik would take Dua away and DK himself keeps reminding her that she loves Vik. Thats the reason Mannat never doubted DK and he had to rely on Ronnie to manipulate her.
Mannat stopped resisting Vik Dua bond after a point since she knew she cant stop that connection and honestly wanted that bond to develop. The whole move to Indore was also Mannat being in favour of Vik but DK overpowered her. She was wrong there and called out by many including me.
Blaming Mannat for all that DK did later is pointless when even Vik doesnt believe that she is at fault.
Like I mentioned yesterday... correlation doesnt imply causation 👍
Cricket
Anupamaa
703